#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: one annoying sit and go situation
Calling there IS his edge over the field.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: one annoying sit and go situation
I can't comment on the $215 tournies as I play mostly $11. As to the $11 I think folding here is bad this is because I think curtains will be ahead in this hand more times than he is facing a set. 67's or any suit for that matter is possible also ak's or ak'os I would be suprised but not shocked to see any random two here k10 910 etc. A lot of people at this limit are simply that bad and this particular player will be somewhat short stacked if he loses hand that often causes people to be desperate, or use the my dick is bigger than yours philosophy. Also I don't really think a $11 player (and with no knowledge any other player either) would move in with a set here.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: one annoying sit and go situation
To avoid any confusion, I refer to EV as risk neutral equity, such as in a ring game. EV should NOT be interpreted as tournament equity.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: one annoying sit and go situation
Usually, for me atleast, pushing gets more calls than a pot sized bet on the flop, when the flush draw comes. Pushing is looked as more of a bluff. Betting the pot gives them improper odds.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: one annoying sit and go situation
[ QUOTE ]
To avoid any confusion, I refer to EV as risk neutral equity, such as in a ring game. EV should NOT be interpreted as tournament equity. [/ QUOTE ] Have you considered that thinking of CEV (Chip EV) in lieu of $EV (tournament equity) is the difference in your thought vs others? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: one annoying sit and go situation
Anyone who folds this hand is playing too high. End of.
Regards Mack |
|
|