|
|
#371
10-10-2005, 11:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***The OFFICIAL Yanks @ Angels ALDS***
dude, regardless, he was not over that line.
|
|
#374
10-10-2005, 11:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***The OFFICIAL Yanks @ Angels ALDS***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sooooooo, are playoff tickets sold series by series?? [/ QUOTE ] Yes. Tickets for the ALCS should go on sale tomorrow in Anaheim. [/ QUOTE ] my first fyp. hehe.
|
|
#375
10-10-2005, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***The OFFICIAL Yanks @ Angels ALDS***
[ QUOTE ]
dude, regardless, he was not over that line. [/ QUOTE ] He clearly was running in fair territory and hence over the line. They just showed a replay with two angles and he clearly was over the line. I agree that the call shouldn't have been made, but it was technically correct.
|
|
#376
10-10-2005, 11:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***The OFFICIAL Yanks @ Angels ALDS***
what a sad last at bat for bernie.
|
|
#377
10-10-2005, 11:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***The OFFICIAL Yanks @ Angels ALDS***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] dude, regardless, he was not over that line. [/ QUOTE ] He clearly was running in fair territory and hence over the line. They just showed a replay with two angles and he clearly was over the line. I agree that the call shouldn't have been made, but it was technically correct. [/ QUOTE ] well actually the rule you quoted stated that the second half of the distance is what mattered, and in the replay you could see him stepping on the line the second half of the distance, so once again, call = wrong.
|
|
#379
10-10-2005, 11:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***The OFFICIAL Yanks @ Angels ALDS***
[ QUOTE ]
what a sad last at bat for bernie. [/ QUOTE ] He'll still be playing baseball next year. The Red Sox have a bunch of free agents leaving. Maybe Bernie will sign with the Sox? [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
|
|
#380
10-10-2005, 11:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***The OFFICIAL Yanks @ Angels ALDS***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] dude, regardless, he was not over that line. [/ QUOTE ] He clearly was running in fair territory and hence over the line. They just showed a replay with two angles and he clearly was over the line. I agree that the call shouldn't have been made, but it was technically correct. [/ QUOTE ] well actually the rule you quoted stated that the second half of the distance is what mattered, and in the replay you could see him stepping on the line the second half of the distance, so once again, call = wrong. [/ QUOTE ] um, no. They showed his last 4 or 5 steps all of which were in fair territory not touching the line. It doesn't matter if one touched the line, if a single one went inside then he could be called out. Like I said, it should have been a no call, but it was correct.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
