Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-2004, 05:42 PM
Audi Audi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 39
Default Bugsy Club - experiences appreciated

Loose/Tight games?
Support prompt & helpful?
Reliable cashouts?
Typical traffic?
Time taken to clear bonus?
Anything else noteworthy?

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2004, 06:08 PM
harboral harboral is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 326
Default Re: Bugsy Club - experiences appreciated

Buysy's is a small site with a few games at lower limits. I found the games I played ($2/4, $4/8 and small NL) to be about like UB - tighter than Party and Paradise, perhaps close to Stars. The bonus is tough to clear, sometimes there was only a single game in my limit to play and I like to play 3 at a time. I never needed support, but a couple players that are part-owners would come and play the games and give money away - so that was nice. Cashout of my win was quick and painless through neteller. I would recommend this site. AL

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2004, 06:23 PM
Cubswin Cubswin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,079
Default Re: Bugsy Club - experiences appreciated

UMMMMM....harboral....i think you are skating on thin ice here with your SPAM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2004, 06:35 PM
Cubswin Cubswin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,079
Default The case against Harboral

This court is now in session. I present 7 pieces of evidence. Members of the jury.... what is your verdict?


One

Two

Three

Four

Five

Six

Seven
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2004, 06:39 PM
Slacker13 Slacker13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fort lauderdale
Posts: 216
Default Re: The case against Harboral

All links have an affiliate code. - Damaging Evidence

3-7 with no chance of parol.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2004, 07:02 PM
Dilbert Dilbert is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 28
Default Re: The case against Harboral

[ QUOTE ]
This court is now in session. I present 7 pieces of evidence. Members of the jury.... what is your verdict?


One

Two

Three

Four

Five

Six

Seven

[/ QUOTE ]
Does the fact that he has bought a classified ad give him any consideration?

Opinions?

edit: Obviously not!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2004, 07:05 PM
Stew Stew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: The case against Harboral

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This court is now in session. I present 7 pieces of evidence. Members of the jury.... what is your verdict?


One

Two

Three

Four

Five

Six

Seven

[/ QUOTE ]
Does the fact that he has bought a classified ad give him any consideration?

Opinions?

edit: Obviously not!

[/ QUOTE ]

No, that's what the ads are for, to keep this garbage off these forums.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-2004, 07:07 PM
GrannyMae GrannyMae is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,449
Default Re: The case against Harboral

Does the fact that he has bought a classified ad give him any consideration?

no

that was the purpose of the creation of classifieds. it is an affordable way for affiliates and portal people who don't want to purchase a banner.

$20 does not give anyone license to paste affiliate codes in legitimate discussions regarding sites. this original poster was starting to get replies and the thread went to sh*t because al is too much of an assshole to refrain from spamming.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-13-2004, 01:42 PM
harboral harboral is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 326
Default I am Guilty!

I have been warned now for being guilty of spamming the forum. Alright, I won't ever mention anything regarding this again, but exactly where in the terms and conditions does it say I can't direct someone to a web site that has reviews of poker rooms? This type of redirecting happens all the time here - although the poster can always say "Oh, I just like the site, I don't have anything to do with it". We mention Bonus Whores all the time in posts - no problem there I guess. I am sorry to have taken up so much of everybody's time with this issue, and while I understand the desire to keep the "affiliate" info out of the posts I really didn't think I was being a jerk for offering site-reviews of online poker rooms. As for Mat telling me I have one more chance - I certainly won't post in anyway that could be considered spam and will keep my post directly related to poker, but just so everybody knows ***Mat had never contacted me, and this is my first and only warning. His post makes it sound as if he has contacted me many times and I have ignored him. This is not the case.

Again, sorry for the inconvenience. AL
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-13-2004, 02:07 PM
lorinda lorinda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: England
Posts: 2,478
Default Re: I am Guilty!

We mention Bonus Whores all the time in posts - no problem there I guess.

Bonus whores was a phrase here long before someone was inspired enough to buy the url.

Lori
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.