Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-25-2005, 06:31 PM
bawcerelli bawcerelli is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 16
Default Re: ($27) Hand vs. bawcerelli

you aint seen nothing yet. just ask fenef, the suckouts i've given him are like 2% of my ROI. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-26-2005, 04:07 AM
bigt439 bigt439 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 134
Default Re: ($27) Hand vs. bawcerelli

This post seems really weird to me. This seems like an easy push with any two, and an easy call with A3s... This gets a little more complicated since you both know each other to be 2+2ers, but folding A3s seems ridiculous... and thinking about pushing K7o for more than two milliseconds seems even more ridiculous...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-26-2005, 04:38 AM
ilya ilya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Party Poker
Posts: 460
Default Re: ($27) Hand vs. bawcerelli

[ QUOTE ]
This post seems really weird to me. This seems like an easy push with any two, and an easy call with A3s... This gets a little more complicated since you both know each other to be 2+2ers, but folding A3s seems ridiculous... and thinking about pushing K7o for more than two milliseconds seems even more ridiculous...

[/ QUOTE ]

If BB is savvy, it's definitely not a push with any 2.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-26-2005, 04:47 AM
bigt439 bigt439 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 134
Default Re: ($27) Hand vs. bawcerelli

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This post seems really weird to me. This seems like an easy push with any two, and an easy call with A3s... This gets a little more complicated since you both know each other to be 2+2ers, but folding A3s seems ridiculous... and thinking about pushing K7o for more than two milliseconds seems even more ridiculous...

[/ QUOTE ]

If BB is savvy, it's definitely not a push with any 2.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I know and I kind of qualified that statement by saying that it changes since they're both 2+2ers... but against anyone else I think this is a push with any 2. I'm just trying to show that sb should be pushing a lot and bb should be calling a fair amount.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-26-2005, 04:56 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: ($27) Hand vs. bawcerelli

[ QUOTE ]
This post seems really weird to me. This seems like an easy push with any two, and an easy call with A3s... This gets a little more complicated since you both know each other to be 2+2ers, but folding A3s seems ridiculous... and thinking about pushing K7o for more than two milliseconds seems even more ridiculous...

[/ QUOTE ]

He definitely knew it was me, if it wasn't for the avatar and username (which is the same), we had chatted at the table too.

Anyway, folding A3s is not ridiculous. It's a close decision no matter which side of the fence you're on.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-26-2005, 05:05 AM
bigt439 bigt439 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 134
Default Re: ($27) Hand vs. bawcerelli

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This post seems really weird to me. This seems like an easy push with any two, and an easy call with A3s... This gets a little more complicated since you both know each other to be 2+2ers, but folding A3s seems ridiculous... and thinking about pushing K7o for more than two milliseconds seems even more ridiculous...

[/ QUOTE ]

He definitely knew it was me, if it wasn't for the avatar and username (which is the same), we had chatted at the table too.

Anyway, folding A3s is not ridiculous. It's a close decision no matter which side of the fence you're on.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well if he's pushing 22+,A2+,K5o+,K2s+,Q9o+,Q8s+,J9s+, then this is +0.2... I don't see how he can not push any of these hands... I see him pushing with waaaay more... Him pushing J9s with you calling 100% of hands is +0.5% so I don't see where the dilemma is... He just has to be so grossly tight for this to be a fold... So tight that I don't think you can make him that no matter what your calling range... Unless he's just way too tight, but I don't think he could be that bad.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-26-2005, 05:09 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: ($27) Hand vs. bawcerelli

[ QUOTE ]

Well if he's pushing 22+,A2+,K5o+,K2s+,Q9o+,Q8s+,J9s+, then this is +0.2... I don't see how he can not push any of these hands... I see him pushing with waaaay more... Him pushing J9s with you calling 100% of hands is +0.5% so I don't see where the dilemma is... He just has to be so grossly tight for this to be a fold... So tight that I don't think you can make him that no matter what your calling range... Unless he's just way too tight, but I don't think he could be that bad.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm in the call camp (I did call) but isn't +0.2% a close call? Some would argue it's a fold since you should fold small edges to reduce variance?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-26-2005, 05:09 AM
bawcerelli bawcerelli is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 16
Default Re: ($27) Hand vs. bawcerelli

i've haven't played too much with dur, but in general i play way tight, much much more than you're average sng'er (that is of course until bubble time). that's why i was a little surprised he called, but of course he knows he has to loosen up a bit against me.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-26-2005, 05:11 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: ($27) Hand vs. bawcerelli

[ QUOTE ]
i've haven't played too much with dur, but in general i play way tight, much much more than you're average sng'er (that is of course until bubble time). that's why i was a little surprised he called, but of course he knows he has to loosen up a bit against me.

[/ QUOTE ]

If it wasn't for this fact I wouldn't have posted the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-26-2005, 05:12 AM
Melchiades Melchiades is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 18
Default Re: ($27) Hand vs. bawcerelli

I hope you yelled at him and called him a fish for calling with that garbage.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.