Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-24-2005, 12:09 PM
belloc belloc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 160
Default Re: 99 -- possible leak

[ QUOTE ]
Definite Leak! 99 is NOT a reraising hand in small stakes holdem. Call the first raise if LAG raiser raises on a wide range of hands--but don't invite a reraise by raising a middle pair with only 2 outs and 5 possible overcards that could hit the flop and beat them--if the CO or LAG are not already in the lead. After the flop : no set no bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

This thinking is a bit narrow and bookish. Isolating a LAG who could be raising with lots of hands (like two broadway cards) is the correct play. Two 9s beats most hands he'll be raising here. You hate getting 4-bet, but you certainly don't want to play this for two cold against two other players.

Once you get headup on the flop, this is close to an ideal board for 99. Bet out the flop, and once raised, the calldown here is fine in a big pot. A flop fold wouldn't be terrible if you're confident about his overpair, but against a loose unknown I think you have to get to a cheap showdown. You'll be shown overpairs here a fair bit, but the times that you catch him raising light will pay for this. I think Zach played this fine.

It doesn't make sense to say things like '99 isn't a raising hand' or 'no set no bet' (you probably say 'fit or fold', too). Poker decisions need to be made with the particular information at hand, not with overgeneralized formulas.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.