|
|
#21
11-01-2005, 04:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Single chip non-verbal raise?
Since the action is to him, its a bet. In limit its a $4 bet and in NL its a $10 bet.
|
|
#22
11-01-2005, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Single chip non-verbal raise?
[ QUOTE ]
Since the action is to him, its a bet. In limit its a $4 bet and in NL its a $10 bet. [/ QUOTE ] Amazing how many of you are getting this completely wrong. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] In either limit or no limit, it is a call. A single oversized chip is a CALL or a BET (if no action in front of, including posted blinds), but never a RAISE. Never ever a RAISE.
|
|
#24
11-01-2005, 07:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Single chip non-verbal raise?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] But you said rule 15 was for limit but it is the same for both. Read rule 15 again. [/ QUOTE ] The rules aren't the same for the first person to act in a round. In limit poker, you are required to bet, e.g., $6. You can't bet more, you can't bet less. A single $25 chip is a $6 bet. In NL poker, a single $25 chip is a $25 bet if you are first to act on the flop/turn/river. The rules ARE the same if the bettor isn't first to act. E.g, if the current bet is $6, a single $25 chip is a call in both NL and limit. [/ QUOTE ] That is what rule 15 states. If you put a single chip in the pot that is larger than the <font color="red"> BET </font> , but do not announce a raise , you are assumed to have only called. Example: In a $3-$6 game, when a player bets $6 and the next player puts a $25 chip in the pot without saying anything, that player has merely called the $6 bet ."
|
|
#25
11-01-2005, 07:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Single chip non-verbal raise?
Gus i am not saying you are wrong about the single chip rule. What i said earlier was that you were wrong to say rule 15 was only for limit when it is not.
|
|
#26
11-01-2005, 09:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Single chip non-verbal raise?
[ QUOTE ]
It's a call. It can get pretty bad. I was playing live and had AA preflop. It came to me, and I said "Y'all know how I roll." and threw in a large chip. The dealer made change for me. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Apparently the way I roll is by revealing the strength of my hand without getting more bets into the pot, embarassing myself and losing money. -Sam [/ QUOTE ] Did you say, "Oh, I wanted to raise" or anything like that? Was this in Tunica?
|
|
#27
11-02-2005, 09:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Single chip non-verbal raise?
From Roberts Rules of Poker:
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Section 3 -- Betting and Raising (Rule 15). "15. If you put a single chip in the pot that is larger than the bet , but do not announce a raise , you are assumed to have only called. [/ QUOTE ] That's the limit rule. The rule is different in No-Limit: [ QUOTE ] Chapter 14: 11. A bet of a single chip or bill without comment is considered to be the full amount of the chip or bill allowed. However, a player acting on a previous bet with a larger denomination chip or bill is calling the previous bet unless this player makes a verbal declaration to raise the pot. (This includes acting on the forced bet of the big blind .) [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] How are these two rules different? They are saying the same thing, limit or no-limit. The only difference is that the no-limit section talks about determining the size of the bet when no verbal declaration is made. Regards, T
|
|
#28
11-02-2005, 11:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Single chip non-verbal raise?
[ QUOTE ]
Gus i am not saying you are wrong about the single chip rule. What i said earlier was that you were wrong to say rule 15 was only for limit when it is not. [/ QUOTE ] I disagree. If the rule was the same for NL, there wouldn't be a separate rule for no-limit (see rule 11 on the linked to page).
|
|
#29
11-02-2005, 12:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Single chip non-verbal raise?
[ QUOTE ]
From Roberts Rules of Poker: [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Section 3 -- Betting and Raising (Rule 15). "15. If you put a single chip in the pot that is larger than the bet , but do not announce a raise , you are assumed to have only called. [/ QUOTE ] That's the limit rule. The rule is different in No-Limit: [ QUOTE ] Chapter 14: 11. A bet of a single chip or bill without comment is considered to be the full amount of the chip or bill allowed. However, a player acting on a previous bet with a larger denomination chip or bill is calling the previous bet unless this player makes a verbal declaration to raise the pot. (This includes acting on the forced bet of the big blind .) [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] How are these two rules different? They are saying the same thing, limit or no-limit. The only difference is that the no-limit section talks about determining the size of the bet when no verbal declaration is made. Regards, T [/ QUOTE ] It's a nitpicky difference that isn't applicable to what the original poster asked. The rules for limit and NL are the same with respect to calls. They are different with respect to bets. E.g., 1/2 limit. After the flop, the first person to act puts in a $5 chip. That's a $1 bet. In 1/2 no-limit, after the flop, the first person to act puts in a $5 chip. That's a $5 bet. In both cases, if there is already a bet, the $5 chip is merely a call.
|
|
#30
11-02-2005, 12:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Single chip non-verbal raise?
[ QUOTE ]
It can get pretty bad. I was playing live and had AA preflop. It came to me, and I said "Y'all know how I roll." and threw in a large chip. The dealer made change for me. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Apparently the way I roll is by revealing the strength of my hand without getting more bets into the pot, embarassing myself and losing money. [/ QUOTE ] This is hilarious.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
