![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wish people did this [censored] at $50 NL.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
?? You're beating an underpair, 5x, or a bluff... why call this river?
Holdem 101, if villian is playing posum and then suddenly spings to life, he's usually not bluffing. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't be results oriented, I think you're losing over 3/4 of the time here. If you had a feeling that villian was trying to take a stand and was a donk goof, then good for you and your read, but I think it's -EV in the long run.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't be results oriented, I think you're losing over 3/4 of the time here. If you had a feeling that villian was trying to take a stand and was a donk goof, then good for you and your read, but I think it's -EV in the long run. [/ QUOTE ] Although I don't know how you decided that this is a bad call 3/4 of the time, I agree that this is a -EV call against most players. However, great read man; can you explain your logic at the time for the call? Did you immediately call, or think for a while? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
?? You're beating an underpair, 5x, or a bluff... why call this river? Holdem 101, if villian is playing posum and then suddenly spings to life, he's usually not bluffing. [/ QUOTE ] To answer blues question, this is 4 handed. I'm playing agressive. Villain is not a tard. He knows I don't have to have a K here. He calls down two bets on a draw heavy board and bets when every single conceivable draw misses. There is no way, and I mean no way, he is going to check/call twice with a good hand here on this board when I could easily be drawing myself. 4 handed, this game is playing way too agressive for that. Call was not instant, I just couldn't put him on too many hands that beat me, besides 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]x[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] or 99/TT. |
![]() |
|
|