|
|
#21
10-10-2005, 01:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What do you think about this semibluff?
[ QUOTE ]
NH as usual. These moves will work better against players at higher limits on tighter sites, seems like that would favor you. Ever though about checking out UB? -James [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Also nice to see some good replies from ... James ... actually trying to help. [/ QUOTE ] LMFAO. |
|
#22
10-10-2005, 01:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What do you think about this semibluff?
it's ok
|
|
#24
10-10-2005, 01:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What do you think about this semibluff?
[ QUOTE ]
Also nice to see some good replies from Holdemkilla, James, etc, people actually trying to help. [/ QUOTE ] wise-ass one-liner sarcastic remark |
|
#25
10-10-2005, 01:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What do you think about this semibluff?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also nice to see some good replies from Holdemkilla, James, etc, people actually trying to help. [/ QUOTE ] "LOL" [/ QUOTE ] An even bigger LOL would be someone with 13000 posts on this forum. How fat are you? Seriously? Truly good players dont spend that much time reading things they find worthless and replying to everything What are you trying to acomplish here? I don't understand you. |
|
#27
10-10-2005, 01:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What do you think about this semibluff?
It's even funny how you are always complaining about the "content" of this forum, how everyone posts crap, how you wanna ban all the ppl who post nonesense
... and yet, you are probably the biggest poster, and it seems you read EVERYTHING. why bother? I sure dont. |
|
#28
10-10-2005, 01:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What do you think about this semibluff?
[ QUOTE ]
Okay here's the deal.. this post was actually an experiment of mine. I wanted to see if your replies to my topics were biased due to all these people flaming me. What I realise is that most of the time, people don't even read my posts, they just see my nickname and reply a wise-ass one-liner sarcastic remark, just to make me look stupid. Sure some of the stuff I've posted on the past is really not educative "hand analysis" material, but that's does't people the right to flame. Just ignore the stuff if it's that bad. Okay so I inverted the names on the hand history, so the HERO on this hand is actually my oponent and I'm villain. Also the guy I was playing against is a very respected well-known player here, and I'd bet if he posted the same hand he'd get much more sympathy. I picked this exact hand cause he played similar to how I would have played. I don't see any problem with this semibluff push, but of course it's not usual for someone to slowplay TPTK the way I did in that hand (I was planning to reraise allin turn, as this guy was really pushing everyone at the table around, betting draws oop etc), so usually his bet would work, pushing out of the pot some weak pair or draw. People saying I played the hand horribly wouldn't say the same if the true "Hero" of this hand posted. Also nice to see some good replies from Holdemkilla, James, etc, people actually trying to help. Oh and screw you guys who respond to every thread you dislike by making a one-line remark wich usually tries to be funny and at the same time mocking the original poster every time. That's just like being an [censored]. [/ QUOTE ] haha. but dude, you still suck. |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
