Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-28-2005, 05:39 PM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: big laydown or is this standard? 2/4 NL

Check/raise sucks on this flop. It's just asking to be played back at since it's so draw heavy.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-28-2005, 05:58 PM
tdomeski tdomeski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 114
Default Re: big laydown or is this standard? 2/4 NL

What do you do if you are him with AA? I don't think I would 3 bet this flop but I dunno I guess it depends which aces I held. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-28-2005, 06:09 PM
tdarko tdarko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: watching channel 9
Posts: 824
Default Re: big laydown or is this standard? 2/4 NL

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think I would 3 bet this flop but I dunno I guess it depends which aces I held. Thoughts?

[/ QUOTE ]
like the A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. i probably wouldn't 3-bet it either way (mainly b/c i would put my opponent on a PP) b/c i would have position and know the villain would be in a tight spot to lead the turn. i think if i just call i have a better chance of extracting more chips thus being more EV.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-28-2005, 10:02 PM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default Re: big laydown or is this standard? 2/4 NL

You got lucky that he didn't smooth call your flop raise and push the turn. He revealed the strength of his hand with the min-reraise and you were able to fold.

Moral: min-reraises are for the birds.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-28-2005, 11:29 PM
tdarko tdarko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: watching channel 9
Posts: 824
Default Re: big laydown or is this standard? 2/4 NL

[ QUOTE ]
You got lucky that he didn't smooth call your flop raise and push the turn. He revealed the strength of his hand with the min-reraise and you were able to fold.


[/ QUOTE ]
this is why when replying to tdomeski's question, "how would you play it if you were him?" i said i would have just called the check raise on the flop. the min-raise reveals way to much about your hand i agree.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-29-2005, 05:08 AM
spino1i spino1i is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26
Default Re: big laydown or is this standard? 2/4 NL

The problem with reraising pre-flop is he smooth-calls you with position (if he has any sort of brain) with AA and folds or calls with QQ. You are almost gaurenteed to drop your stack here if he has AA, since you are the aggressor and out of position (unless you just plan to check on an ace/king-less flop?) As it stood, I would have called his raise, and folded to his initial bet, figuring him for QQ or AA. That is assuming that this is 10-max and he is your typical TAG player that populates 2/4 NL 10-max.

As it stood, he played very poorly, reraising on the flop. He allowed you to make a laydown with a hand weaker than his and jepordized his whole stack against a hand stronger than his (i.e. a set). Smooth calling is a much smarter move on his part.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.