|
|
#22
08-25-2005, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LAG HAND FOR MATT FLYNN
i usually say that when i really have trash as a reverse reverse tell since people are so keen on reverse tells. i was actually pretty surprised OP took that immediately as weakness.
|
|
#23
08-25-2005, 08:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG HAND FOR MATT FLYNN
Moving in on the river is one thing, check calling is totally horrible. Not that I like your preflop play. Your stack is too small AND you're out of position. I tend to think joke reraises should almost always be performed in position.
Seems to me that these stakes were small and you were just [censored] around but then I don't see why you posted it. If you were actually trying to make money in the game would you have played like this? True his comments are suspicious but I thought you gave up on the turn anyway. My guess is you won the hand but I still think it's gross.
|
|
#24
08-26-2005, 12:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG HAND FOR MATT FLYNN
[ QUOTE ]
I hate this hand. It feels too random preflop, the stacks are way too short for that kind of preflop aggression with a hand that relies heavily on fold equity, you are out of position, and the player sounds like a caller, so you get little fold equity preflop. [/ QUOTE ] look, i gave my reasoning. i had a tell that assured me that the PFR had a weak hand. im sure he would have just kept his mouth shut with AA-TT,AK/AQ... obviously he has something playable to raise it here, so what. if he calls PF trying to get lucky, he is gonna miss and fold to a bet often... the sb lended credibility and dead money to my raise, and i know he is folding as there is no way he is flat callling there with a top hand, and he has very much respect for my game and tries to stay out of my way.
|
|
#25
08-26-2005, 01:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG HAND FOR MATT FLYNN
[ QUOTE ]
I tend to think joke reraises should almost always be performed in position. [/ QUOTE ]uhhhm, WHY? you never double raise out of the blind as a bluff? what about unraised pots? it must be really tough to play against someone who only raises out of the blind with AA-QQ.
|
|
#26
08-26-2005, 05:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG HAND FOR MATT FLYNN
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I tend to think joke reraises should almost always be performed in position. [/ QUOTE ]uhhhm, WHY? you never double raise out of the blind as a bluff? what about unraised pots? it must be really tough to play against someone who only raises out of the blind with AA-QQ. [/ QUOTE ] Good point
|
|
#28
08-26-2005, 06:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG HAND FOR MATT FLYNN
i cant comment on anything really because its all based on your reads.
|
|
#29
08-26-2005, 07:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG HAND FOR MATT FLYNN
[ QUOTE ]
i cant comment on anything really because its all based on your reads. [/ QUOTE ]fair enough.. i basically posted this hand for you guys' entertainment, and to contribute something to matts challenge. maybe ill post a more serious higher stakes hand for the challenge soon.
|
|
#30
08-26-2005, 10:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LAG HAND FOR MATT FLYNN
hence my point about not saying "the only hand i beat is JT, can i see a card?" but rather just asking to see a card. this way if he actually has JJ now he knows he is good (if you're not lying, yadda yadda) and will gladly show you one of them.
caveat: i think there's a .001% chance he has JJ but i'm just explaning my logic to you crazy folk.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
