#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A little lesson in markets
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] And in response to that other thread, I also feel that .... [/ QUOTE ] I think this is the key to our differences. natedogg [/ QUOTE ] Do you mean because I'm able to realize that although I may believe something as factual, I am still ultimately only expressing an opinion, and word it as such? Or do you mean that you are beyond opinions, and have the be-all and end-all answers to everything? [/ QUOTE ] No, I mean that you are basing your analysis on how you *feel* about the issue, whereas I am not. natedogg |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A little lesson in markets
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] And in response to that other thread, I also feel that .... [/ QUOTE ] I think this is the key to our differences. natedogg [/ QUOTE ] Do you mean because I'm able to realize that although I may believe something as factual, I am still ultimately only expressing an opinion, and word it as such? Or do you mean that you are beyond opinions, and have the be-all and end-all answers to everything? [/ QUOTE ] No, I mean that you are basing your analysis on how you *feel* about the issue, whereas I am not. natedogg [/ QUOTE ] Quit being a nit, and substitute the word "feel" with "think" and explain to me how how you differ. Actually, nevermind. I think that sums it up quite nicely. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A little lesson in markets
Well, I posted an explanation of how it would be possible for us to feel confident that
a restaurant was reasonably clean even in the absence of coercive regulation. It was a detailed, well-thought out scenario covering all the bases. Your responses included such brilliant insight as: "Cost is for the weak, right? " and "you'd probably be living in a dumpster. " and " but once the socioeconomic structure is there, government regulations are clearly the only way to go. " (with no explanation for why this is true). When you finally admitted this much: " And in response to that other thread, I also feel that if the looming energy crisis were to be decided by free market economics, sustenance would belong only to the highest bidders. " The conspicuous lack of any *reasons* for this feeling, which only continued the trend, made me realize that you were reacting with your gut, and relying on your emotions. Which I mentioned as the most likely reason that we don't see eye to eye. natedogg |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A little lesson in markets
ahhh, you're probably right. i really don't know what i'm talking about when it comes to this stuff. your avatar just makes me wanna argue with you for some reason.
|
|
|