|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: You're first to act UTG+1 with Pocket 9's. How do you open? | |||
| raise 4x BB |
   
|
8 | 11.43% |
| raise > 4 BB |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| raise 3x BB |
  
|
4 | 5.71% |
| mini-rasie 2x BB |
  
|
3 | 4.29% |
| limp |
  
|
55 | 78.57% |
| Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
07-27-2005, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To limp, or not to limp, that is the... leak?!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The BB/100 rate for the $20NL level isn't very accurate due to lack of hands and a recent downswing. [/ QUOTE ] Winrates over 2,000 hands aren't accurate anyway. This is a dangerous way of thinking, though. Downswings are part of the game like anything else. They are factored into everybody's winrate. [/ QUOTE ] i'm not that ignorant of poker player, lack of hands plus current downswing would make for a inacurrate BB/100 rating.... Why is that a dangerous way to think? It's so inacurrate that if i had one good day, my rate would be substantially better. anyway, all i really want to know is how much i should deviate from my tight/passive-passive mouse status when moving from one level to another. 
|
|
#22
07-27-2005, 10:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To limp, or not to limp, that is the... leak?!
I agree that I need more information. With deep stacks, I will limp with any pocket pair from any position. I will raise with jacks up from any position. Midpairs and lower I vary when I raise them in later positions (depending on how many limpers there are, possibility of reraises, etc.)
At a really passive table, I will limp with a lot of the hands you have listed. But normally, I would fold most of those.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
