|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Weight, Age | |||
| 300-350, age 30 or more |
   
|
3 | 1.38% |
| 300-350, under age 30 |
  
|
2 | 0.92% |
| 250-300, age 30 or more |
  
|
8 | 3.69% |
| 250-300, under age 30 |
  
|
13 | 5.99% |
| 200-250, age 30 or more |
  
|
18 | 8.29% |
| 200-250, under age 30 |
  
|
40 | 18.43% |
| 150-200, age 30 or more |
|
21 | 9.68% |
| 150-200, under age 30 |
|
64 | 29.49% |
| 100-150, age 30 or more |
|
6 | 2.76% |
| 100-150, under age 30 |
|
38 | 17.51% |
| under 100 pounds, age 30 or more |
|
0 | 0% |
| under 100 pounds, under age 30 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 500+, age 30 or more |
|
3 | 1.38% |
| 500+, under age 30 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 450-500, age 30 or more |
|
0 | 0% |
| 450-500, under age 30 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 400-450, age 30 or more |
|
0 | 0% |
| 400-450, under age 30 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 350-400, age 30 or more |
|
0 | 0% |
| 350-400, under age 30 |
|
1 | 0.46% |
| Voters: 217. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
07-27-2005, 02:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PARTY SKINS ALERT!
[ QUOTE ]
this poll should never have been created. [/ QUOTE ] FYP 
|
|
#22
07-27-2005, 02:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PARTY SKINS ALERT!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] this poll should never have been created. [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] actually i think its a valid post and very important. i just did a bunch of bonuses for party and am trying to decide where to go when i start a rakeback account. some ppl will probly say just do them all, it doesn't matter. but i don't have the br to start 5 accounts and then end up franticly spliting my time to clear bonuses.
|
|
#23
07-27-2005, 02:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PARTY SKINS ALERT!
[ QUOTE ]
actually i think its a valid post and very important. [/ QUOTE ] Actually, it is not. For starters, the poll asks for one answer about three different topics: the amount of bonuses, how easy to clear, and softness of games. Most answers will concentrate on what the respondent feels is most important to him, so the result will be meaningless. The bonuses and the clearing requirements are posted here regularly. These are facts, not opinions. Some sites require 5x or 7x play to clear, some require 15x or 20x. That ain't rocket science to figure out. The question about the softness of the games is also meaningless. The same players play at the ring games and SnGs on all sites. Are the .5/1 O8 games softer at Party or at Empire? Duh! They are the exact same games with the exact same players. Only the names are different. The MTTs vary at the different sites, but they vary in size and structure, and there is not provision in the poll for addressing this. In short, this poll is a major waste of time, as is the poster.
|
|
#24
07-27-2005, 03:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PARTY SKINS ALERT!
TY,
most people are here to bash
|
|
#25
07-29-2005, 10:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PARTY SKINS ALERT!
People should not be allowed to post here unless they have played all the sites. This thread has went to crap because of that.
|
|
#26
07-29-2005, 10:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PARTY SKINS ALERT!
[ QUOTE ]
It's so obvious, Party Poker by far has the fishiest players [/ QUOTE ] don't all the skins have the same players? how could one site be more fishy than the other?
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
