Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-06-2005, 12:11 PM
A_PLUS A_PLUS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: Squeeze-ish Play... Any good?

[ QUOTE ]
I don't have alot of confidence in getting to any specific ranges without having seen any of the prior hands.

I think there is zero % chance UTG folds and most of the time its 4 ways, and some of the time its 3 ways.

[/ QUOTE ]

How can you not be able to give a hand range, but be ablet o know with 100% certainty that he wont fold?

[ QUOTE ]
Is hero 25% in the center pot. Maybe, its hard to move up and down in multiway pots. Is hero a clear favorite? Probably not.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you wait for a spot where you are a clear favorite, your 600+ chips will be much less, and essentially worthless relative to the blinds.


[ QUOTE ]
As to our styles being different, I have never seen you play, and its presumptuous for you to think my game is w/t.

[/ QUOTE ]

Unless your play completely contradicts your advice, our tournament philosophies are night and day. I say push, you say fold, etc, etc.

Quite possible I am a LAG idiot and you are a genius, but our styles are VERY different
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-06-2005, 11:59 AM
Sluss Sluss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Still finishing bleeding
Posts: 220
Default Re: Squeeze-ish Play... Any good?

I like this play better if a) the stacks are deeper or b) I have a very tight image.

If I have been getting no decent cards in no decent spots and lost most of my chips on AK vs A9 (when A9 rivered two pair) that was shown down. I might try it. If UTG was someone who would open to steal from a tight player, then saw all of those callers and figures there is no way he is ahead of me.

I think this is +CEV vs all of the callers and -CEV vs. UTG. So there is a pretty good shot I muck this unless my image is really tight and I think UTG knows that.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-06-2005, 12:10 PM
DireWolf DireWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 137
Default Re: Squeeze-ish Play... Any good?

Alot of people are saying they would like this hand better if stacks were deeper. I think thats a given, but still doesn't mean this isn't a +ev play, maybe just less of one.

Here are my arguments
1)hero is risking 625 to win ~1500. Against the range 88+ and AJ+ hero is 2-1. Obviously reads help here alot, but your not always gunna have reads. Pushing here against UTG here is +ev since your odds are a bit better than 2-1.

2)the two cold callers most likely have a hand range that is worst than UTG since there was no reraise. So if either of these players come along, it is a good thing.

3)Since it is party poker, you will sometimes get a donk who either has a horrible hand, or folds a hand they should call with.

4)you don't want to go into the 50-100 level with only 600 chips.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-06-2005, 12:02 PM
Sam T. Sam T. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 160
Default Re: Squeeze-ish Play... Any good?

Later in the tournament or with AK, I don't mind this, but I honestly don't think you have much folding equity here, and that dramatically undermines the value of the play. Unless this is a table full of rocks (which seems unlikely given the action seen here), you're probably going to get called down by more than one player.

-UTG because: he's already shown strength from EP, he would be horribly short-stacked if he folded, and Party players hate to fold after putting in the first raise. It is a sleight against their manhood.

-MP1 and/or MP3 because of massive pot-odds, and they've got big stacks.

AJ against three random hands wins 35% of the time, which in light of the odds is better than great, except that you aren't up against three random hands.

Re-raising with this hand in position is a viable play, but only if your raise will thin the field, and leave you enough chips to play post-flop if your initial raise is called. Niether condition seems to apply here.

FWIW, I agree with the camp that says you are far too likely to be dominated for my taste. Sure UTG could be on AT, KQ, or mid-pockets, but absent a read that seems a bit optimistic. As for the folks that follow, you could easily be looking at AQ, or a weak-tighty with AK who want to see if his hand hits before committing all his chips. But I've been surprised before.

Sam
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-06-2005, 01:28 PM
Jman28 Jman28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 234
Default Results

Firstly, I know this isn't exactly a squeeze play as evidence by my title.

Looking back, I'm still not sure about the move at all. I think a fold might be better.

As for the actual hand. UTG called and the other two players folded. UTG turned up T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], and my hand held up.

If I had known what kind of player UTG was before this hand, the play would've been much clearer. Thanks for the replies.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-06-2005, 01:38 PM
A_PLUS A_PLUS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: Results

Not to be results oriented, but can we at least agree that AT is firmly in the raising range, and that there is a possibility that our push gets us heads up?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.