Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Bracket
Eminem 29 80.56%
William Hung 7 19.44%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-17-2005, 05:23 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,044
Default Re: Dynasty on starvation. Am I being overly sensitive?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Dynasty's statement was absurd

[/ QUOTE ]
There are now 11 voters who belive Dynasty was correct in concluding that anyone who starves to death basically does so by choice.

[/ QUOTE ]

That was not what I said.

Your ridiculous misrepresentation is why I hardly ever get involved in these ridiculous threads. Even if somebody clearly states something, somebody else will read it whatever way they want to make it mean something else.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-17-2005, 05:56 PM
jcx jcx is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 42
Default Re: Dynasty on starvation. Am I being overly sensitive?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Dynasty's statement was absurd

[/ QUOTE ]
There are now 11 voters who belive Dynasty was correct in concluding that anyone who starves to death basically does so by choice. I wonder if it's possible to get one or more of them to offer any reasoning behind their belifs

[/ QUOTE ]

What needs to be explained that has not been said? It is almost always the local govt's mismangement/misappropriation of land or food supplies that results in local starvation. War is also a bitch. What is your real intention here? I sense it is to try and point fingers at the evil white man starving out the poor around the world for our amusement. Well, I'm not signing up for that guilt trip.

To explain why, please consider the nation of Zimbabwe. A few thousand white farmers, most of whom bought their land with the blessing of Robert Mugabe's regime, once produced enough food to feed not only the entire nation of Zimbabwe, but most of its neighbors besides. Their lands were stolen from them (which I imagine you approved of. Forgive me if I am incorrect) and distributed to Mugabe's cronies, who sent in squatters to enforce their claims. As a result of this, no one will loan money to farms in Zimbabwe & the few with the know-how to run a large farming operation have fled the country. So a nation whos granaries were bursting at the seams a few short years ago now faces famine conditions in certain parts of the country. As an aside, we might also consider the livelihoods provided by those farmers to the local populations that have been lost (farm hands, truck drivers, etc).

There are hundreds of millions of impoverished peasants in China and India, both developing nations who are not yet rich by any means. Yet the overwhelming majority of their respective populations manage to eat every day. How do they pull this off? For whatever the individual human rights problems these nations have (and it is considerable), they do not engage in policies that will cause the systematic starvation of their populations. It is unfortunate that so many tin-pot dictators do. While I have sympathy for those who live under such regimes, their plight is not my fault and there is nothing I can do for them.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-18-2005, 03:40 AM
Il_Mostro Il_Mostro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 72
Default Re: Dynasty on starvation. Am I being overly sensitive?

[ QUOTE ]
It's not that hard to get food. Millenia before our ancestors discovered fire, they managed to eat.

[/ QUOTE ]
So, it's not hard to get food. But people who starve to death does not do it by choice?

Please enlighten us.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-18-2005, 03:45 AM
Il_Mostro Il_Mostro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 72
Default Re: Dynasty on starvation. Am I being overly sensitive?

I belive you are changing the scope.

I understand Dynastys words as being directed to the individual person starving, not to the government or whatever. And since he refuses to explain what he meant I can only go with my understanding of his statement.

[ QUOTE ]
What is your real intention here?

[/ QUOTE ]
My real intention is exactly what I stated in my OP. I want to know if people agree with the statement. I find it to be absurd and ignorant.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-18-2005, 07:06 AM
evil_twin evil_twin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 52
Default Re: Dynasty on starvation. Am I being overly sensitive?

[ QUOTE ]
Your ridiculous misrepresentation is why I hardly ever get involved in these ridiculous threads. Even if somebody clearly states something, somebody else will read it whatever way they want to make it mean something else.

[/ QUOTE ]

From the thread "Helping the World's Poor", discussing the thousands of people who are starving to death daily:

[ QUOTE ]
Well, it would seem that in order for everybody to get these services, they would only have to pony up about $5-$20 each per year. If people aren't willing to do what it takes to earn and pay that amount themselves, why should I be giving it away?

[/ QUOTE ]

Feel free to not get involved, but your original statement was entirely absurd and you've done nothing to back it up since. This is simply because you can't.

We don't live in a world where everyone has a chance. Many millions of people have absolutely no chance at all.

Feel free not to care about that and not to donate money. But don't pretend it's not happening. Or indeed that corrupt governments are the entire reason we can't help resolve the issue.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-18-2005, 02:56 PM
wacki wacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 109
Default Re: Dynasty on starvation. Am I being overly sensitive?

[ QUOTE ]
Dynasty's statement was absurd. But he has the right not to explain it. Sometimes people say things that they would rather just see buried and forgotten. I've certainly done that before on this board, and probably will sometime again. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. On the other hand people over their reject our gifts of free Polio Vaccines because they think we are trying to poison them. Attitudes like that makes me lose faith in them.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-19-2005, 04:47 PM
wacki wacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 109
Default Re: Dynasty on starvation. Am I being overly sensitive?

"I agree. On the other hand people over there reject our gifts of free Polio Vaccines because they think we are trying to poison them. Attitudes like that makes me lose faith in them."

fixed spelling. I am starting to think I'm dyslexic. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

-drunk wacki
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-19-2005, 10:01 PM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: Dynasty on starvation. Am I being overly sensitive?

Didn't the European/American Settlers give blankets to the Indians filled with smallpox? Just something to think about.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.