Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-06-2005, 02:37 PM
sourbeaver sourbeaver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 164
Default Re: Set under set under set. And i runner runner the flush.

Implied odds, not pot odds !!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-06-2005, 02:44 PM
sourbeaver sourbeaver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 164
Default Re: Set under set under set. And i runner runner the flush.

Good hand, but let's say he was going to raise it 5 or 6. I think you get his stack anyway when you coldcall PF.

I use a 10 or 12x ratio to evaluate what kind of profit is needed for a PP wanting a set, assuming you're not putting any more money in when you don't hit a set on the flop.

So 6$ called PF : profit needed (assuming 10x) is 60$ on average to break even.

9$ called PF : 90$

So for a 3$ raise on the flop, your difference in overlay is -30$. This assumes you'll stack opponent regardless of your raise and calling the reraise, or simply limp-calling his raise. The way villain played it, you were getting his stack no matter what.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-06-2005, 03:02 PM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: Set under set under set. And i runner runner the flush.

This is a very easy call preflop. Just beware the AK6 flop.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.