|
|
#21
06-03-2005, 11:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: RIVER??
rmarotti,
Again, no offense whatsoever intended, but saying because he's a thinking player he knew you had the straight on the turn is about as bad as you not 3-betting the river. I'm sorry but he's raising this river with two pair or better and you should have 3-bet. You're being results oriented on this one. Chief 
|
|
#22
06-03-2005, 11:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RIVER??
[ QUOTE ]
rmarotti, Again, no offense whatsoever intended, but saying because he's a thinking player he knew you had the straight on the turn is about as bad as you not 3-betting the river. I'm sorry but he's raising this river with two pair or better and you should have 3-bet. You're being results oriented on this one. Chief [/ QUOTE ] Suppose yer prolly right. . .
|
|
#23
06-03-2005, 12:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RIVER??
he can easily put you on two pair also when you cr the turn, and as a result be raising with AQ/QQ etc. I think you're giving him credit for a much too precise read, he can't see your cards and there's a good chance you play two pair like this also. I think it's an easy 3 bet 4 handed, especially since it doesn't really seem like you have to pay off a cap, eh?
--turnipmonster
|
|
#24
06-03-2005, 12:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RIVER??
[ QUOTE ]
SB was looooooose and there was a good chance he would coldcall UTG's almost certain raise so i thought the flop bet was thinly for value. [/ QUOTE ] You bet a draw into a LAG expecting him to raise so you could face the field with 2 cold for value?!
|
|
#26
06-03-2005, 12:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RIVER??
[ QUOTE ]
rmarotti, Again, no offense whatsoever intended, but saying because he's a thinking player he knew you had the straight on the turn is about as bad as you not 3-betting the river. I'm sorry but he's raising this river with two pair or better and you should have 3-bet. You're being results oriented on this one. Chief [/ QUOTE ] Second Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
