#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would an AIDS cure really be beneficial on a global level?
The health of condom companies is not very important to me, but I was just listing all the possible things that I thought would result from an AIDS cure. Obviously pregnancies/overpopulation is a much more important issue.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would an AIDS cure really be beneficial on a global level?
If this is the stance you are taking then I assume you believe the tsunami was a good thing?
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would an AIDS cure really be beneficial on a global level?
Like I said, I don't take this stance, and I don't know if Sooga really does or not, but there is a big difference between AIDS and the tsunami, namely choice.
A large portion (in the USA, dang near all, though much much less so in other nations) of people who get AIDS do so by entering activities where they know a potential result is AIDS. They enter a reasonably dangerous situation willfully. With the tsunami, nobody CHOSE to have that happen. (yes, I realize you could say that by living near the water, they chose to accept that risk, but that's really quite silly logic that I hope you won't espouse). Josh |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would an AIDS cure really be beneficial on a global level?
[ QUOTE ]
Do you agree? [/ QUOTE ] In the US (and the rest of the western world) yes. In third-world countries, no, not really. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would an AIDS cure really be beneficial on a global level?
[ QUOTE ]
Like I said, I don't take this stance, and I don't know if Sooga really does or not, but there is a big difference between AIDS and the tsunami, namely choice. A large portion (in the USA, dang near all, though much much less so in other nations) of people who get AIDS do so by entering activities where they know a potential result is AIDS. They enter a reasonably dangerous situation willfully. With the tsunami, nobody CHOSE to have that happen. (yes, I realize you could say that by living near the water, they chose to accept that risk, but that's really quite silly logic that I hope you won't espouse). [/ QUOTE ] If we are speaking purely from a population control standpoint, AIDS is MUCH bigger epidemic in Africa where choice plays a much smaller percentage. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would an AIDS cure really be beneficial on a global level?
what are these "con-doms" that you all keep talking about?
Catch- |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would an AIDS cure really be beneficial on a global level?
AIDS kills gays.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would an AIDS cure really be beneficial on a global level?
[ QUOTE ]
Imagine an AIDS cure were found tomorrow. Here's a list of what I think some of the repercussions would be, which I think would be visible in just a few months: -Spread of other STDs, since people I think would be less cautious. -Increase in pregnancies, for the same reason. -Condom manufacturers would be hurt financially. But now that I think about it, I'm not sure if sexual activity would really increase in any significant amount. I guess what I'm asking is, would the positives outweigh these (and other) possible negatives? [/ QUOTE ] youre a moron |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would an AIDS cure really be beneficial on a global level?
2 million African CHILDREN are currently infected with AIDS, and this is the best you can come up with?
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would an AIDS cure really be beneficial on a global level?
I'd much rather see a cure for anal warts tomorrow, I can barely sit down.
|
|
|