|
|
#24
04-21-2005, 12:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 22/33 players
I have 500 $33s logged and 400 $22s. I started at the $33s, and the first 250 or so were during the 'tough' hours. I had a couple of ugly drops and tried the $22s. Nearly all the $22s were during peak hours.
My ROI at the $33s is nearly 0. My ROI at the $22s is 35%. Obviously I'm running cold in the former and hot in the latter. I haven't played the $33s for a bit, but I felt that during peak hours, $33s were worth the move up not a 'must'. During slow hours I felt that the $22s were at least nearly as profitable as the $33s. 
|
|
#25
04-21-2005, 02:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 22/33 players
If I had typed up Mr_j's post word for word it would almost perfectly describe my experience at the 20s/30s.
After moving up to the 30s then getting on a really bad run my ROI dropped to 0%. Now I'm back at the 20's mainly to rebuild my confidence more than anything else.
|
|
#27
04-21-2005, 03:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 22/33 players
If you are including me, I started at the $33s and only dropped down to the $22s after an ugly run. In theory I'd earn a bit more at the $33s, but I'm not losing any sleep over it, mainly because I'm moving to the $55s for good soon (after I get comfy 8+ tabling, get my NL HU going and O8 on track. Found occasionally playing stuff apart from sngs keeps sngs fresh and grindable).
|
|
#28
04-21-2005, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 22/33 players
I have a small sample size though at the 30s and was getting much, much better cards on the 20s. I plan on returning to the 30s shortly (hopefully within a week I'll feel ready mentally).
|
|
#29
04-21-2005, 03:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 22/33 players
[ QUOTE ]
Take an average 20$-sitngo, replace one bad player by a decent player and you have an average 30$-sitngo. [/ QUOTE ]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
