![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
That is the big $25000 buy-in event at the end of the World Poker Tour. It is played at the Bellagio. Every winner from other WPT events also wins a buy-in to this event.
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
It would be helpful if we had a rough estimate on how many players they are expecting for this event.
I too noticed how close the Sklansky line was to the odds on Mimi Rogers. I might be inclined to take Sklansky....but he would probably say that at those odds that a bet on him is -EV (depending on the number of entrants of course). Raymer and Phillips might be okay bets too. Those are the only 3 that I can immediately find that I like. Golly....I'm such a 2+2 ass-kisser aren't I?? The line on Chip Jett isn't quite high enough for me either....but I kind of will keep an eye on him after sitting at his table for a couple of hours and coming away REALLY impressed with his hyper-aggressive style. Line on Harrington isn't high enough for me to bet on it either. Obviously I like the chances of a Hansen, Lederer or Juanda...but not at those lines. WAY too low probably (again...don't know how many entrants they are expecting). Same for Greenstein and Ferguson. I would want more like +15000 on these guys (not +10000 or +11000). Pretty amused that all 3 of the Brenes brothers are getting the same line. Thanks for posting the lines....pretty interesting to see how the wagering sites are ranking these guys. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bodog.com has the worst odds I've ever seen for any kind of ... I don't know, they're just the worst odds ever.
Michael Mizrachi is paying 5-1. Yes, this tournament, which had 344 entries last year and will surely have more this year, is expected to be won by The Grinder 1 out of every 6 times. He's the next coming of Ungar!! And Lindgren is 6-1. Yet another Ungar on our hands.. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, out of curiosity I went and looked at those and I almost fell out of my chair... Nobody on their list of 50 people is worse than 60 to 1 except for one guy that I assume is on the list as a joke.
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Probably none of them below 150 can be good bets especially if the field is any larger than 450. but compared to the 25 - 1 or 30 -1 some other places offered in this past this is definitely a bit better.
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
202 Mimi Rogers +20000 203 David Sklansky +18000 Mimi Rogers is pretty close to even with Sklansky???? [/ QUOTE ] Mimi Rogers has a bigger (chip) rack than Sklansky. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
This isn't the first time Bodog has had ridiculous bad odds.
I'm guessing they are getting a lot of action though...so they are simply offering what they can get away with. |
![]() |
|
|