Aggression check...A3 sooted

[DrunkHamster]

Apart from the pfr, this looks perfect to me (but what do I know?) I might raise it if first in, but I'm not sure if it is worth doing after 1 limper. I assume the flop and turn bets were for value, and after the raise preflop, betting the ace looks fine.

[just2pimp]

I like this hand except for the raise pf,

the way you played it the rest of the streets are fine to me, I would expect to either be called and lose to a stronger ace, raised by a better ace, or exactly what happened with the the folds since with the raise pf and leading the betting you created a lot of fold equity (someone tell me if im thinking dumb here)

after reading responses someone mentioned if a non ace had fallen...the fold equity would come more into play their aswell (again tell me if thats wrong/dumb)

[toss]

Who don't you like the raise PF? He says the table is passive and buying position is valuable. Also knocking out the blinds and assuming aggression.

[just2pimp]

well I dont dislike it very much, I just dont see myself doing it as im going to be paying more for a position in which if an ace falls on the flop instead of the flush draw I must bet and will still only be called down by a stronger ace