Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-29-2005, 06:40 PM
ace_in_the_hole ace_in_the_hole is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 23k hands so far in March
Posts: 235
Default Re: Are SnG\'s the worst way to play with variance?

Thanks for the responses. My $3/100 stat is over 50,000 hands of 4 tabling party NL $25. So I was making $10/hr. How much should I have been making as a good No LImit ring player? How much would you all be making?
My main dibacle is that i am trying to stick to one area of the game and play lots and lots for 3 months to save and hopefully play the higher limits. When im ready of course. ; ) I also feel a lot of animosity(sp?) towards me on these boards. But I love it. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-29-2005, 06:50 PM
skipperbob skipperbob is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Are SnG\'s the worst way to play with variance?

[ QUOTE ]
My main dibacle / I also feel a lot of animosity(sp?) towards me on these boards. But I love it. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

You questioned the spelling of animosity, but not dibacle?
It ain't animosity Dude, it's pity [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:06 PM
ace_in_the_hole ace_in_the_hole is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 23k hands so far in March
Posts: 235
Default Re: Are SnG\'s the worst way to play with variance?

Cause I am so helpless in this world. My typing skills are obviously tied in directly with my poker skills so thanks for the pity. I know realize after all this wasted time that the 50,000 hands of winning poker I played was a fluke. I was running good, and I will never see those results again. Thanks for the pity and I will keep plugging away and feeding money to all the 2+2 multitablers. Come play your AQ's against my AK's and your 88's against my AA's I can't win. I'm pathetic.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:08 PM
ace_in_the_hole ace_in_the_hole is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 23k hands so far in March
Posts: 235
Default Re: Are SnG\'s the worst way to play with variance?

Just kidding. I am going to make a good secondary income of this game in the coming months and it is all thanks to you guys, even the beraters, I get all my motivation to learn and play better from you all. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:14 PM
TruFloridaGator TruFloridaGator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 638
Default Re: Are SnG\'s the worst way to play with variance?

I have a similar situation right now. I went from having about 15% ROI in my 1st 75, down to like -3% overall right over my past 75. Here's my philosphy. While I work on things & continue to get better, keep this in mind. When you have this small of a sample with a -ROI, remember you are always 1-2 wins from having a + ROI. You need a much larger sample before jumping to conclusions. Although it's tough to keep this philosophy after having a guy AI HU & losing w/ my AK vs A6(he made a str8), 5 minutes ago. None the less, keep at it. PM me if you ever need to because I'm in the same boat as you.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:20 PM
ace_in_the_hole ace_in_the_hole is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 23k hands so far in March
Posts: 235
Default Re: Are SnG\'s the worst way to play with variance?

Thanks Gator. I might be giving u a PM this weekend. I plan on playing 100 SnG's in 36 hours.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:23 PM
Slim Pickens Slim Pickens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 786
Default Re: Are SnG\'s the worst way to play with variance?

I am in a similar situation right now. My Roth IRA dropped 1.3% over the last week, so I'm going to have to bump my retirement back to May of 2045 from January 2045. It's a good thing I have the up-to-the-minute stock ticker installed so I can keep track of this and adjust accordingly.

Slim
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:31 PM
TheUsher TheUsher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 647
Default Re: Are SnG\'s the worst way to play with variance?

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks Gator. I might be giving u a PM this weekend. I plan on playing 100 SnG's in 36 hours.

[/ QUOTE ]

Asking about ROI then 100 SNG's in 36 hours what, 4 tabling? I wish I had the stamina, much less the heart to do this. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] If this is 8 tabling, I'll still pray for you as it's not going to be easy. No offense or anything.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-30-2005, 04:56 AM
ace_in_the_hole ace_in_the_hole is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 23k hands so far in March
Posts: 235
Default Re: Are SnG\'s the worst way to play with variance?

I'm gonna put in three 5-6 hour days 4 tabling, which should be about 30-35 SnG's a day.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-30-2005, 05:12 AM
TheUsher TheUsher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 647
Default Re: Are SnG\'s the worst way to play with variance?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm gonna put in three 5-6 hour days 4 tabling, which should be about 30-35 SnG's a day.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd be very interested in your results if you wouldn't mind after you're done. No reason really since it won't have any point if you're +50% ROI or -50% ROI but still it's nice to know what happened. Would this be the first time you did a marathon like that?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.