![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Heads-up NL 5 card stud, by a mile. There is so much skill involved in it, a weaker player has almost no chance. Similar to chess. [/ QUOTE ] |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In any NL game, a bad player could simply go all-in on the first betting round every single time. Games like Holdem, no matter how deep stacked, can be reduced to a simple game of all-ins where any idiot using this strategy could beat the best pros 25% of the time, it's not a winning strategy, but it gives anyone a shot against anyone.
For heads up, limit is a much more skillful style since the better player is going to have to prove it over a series of hands. Of the games, I don't have enough experience playing the lesser known games to give good reasons as to why one is better than another. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Opinions need here, folks. What game do you guys think is best to determine heads-up skill? Ideally, it would be multiple games, but we're talking only one game here - one form of poker. I've heard arguments for Stud H/L or Limit hold'em, myself. Your opinions? [/ QUOTE ] You should know not to post this crap if you have not searched the archives for hours. The regulars here get quite upset. There is a word for what they do, it is called forum tilt. They are like a tuned up pinball machine. Just breath the wrong way and they tilt. Now to your question. HAVE YOU TRIED WAR? Remember you played it as a kid? You just put $100 on each card and bang you have your heads up game. ...That makes me feel bigger, posting like the other jerks here. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps it should be PL 5-card stud then, this negates the ability of the weaker player to go all-in straight away.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thats not really needed. Many starting hand combinations yield much larger advantages in 5-stud than in holdem. Think about AA vs two random cards on a five card board instead of a seven card board. BIG difference.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skalansky or perhaps Malmuth once wrote an essay where he concludes that stud hi/lo with declare was the game with the biggest skill. The reason being that the skill in the declare part would give the better player a huge edge.
Personally, I would go with liar's poker. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Heads-up NL 5 card stud, by a mile. There is so much skill involved in it, a weaker player has almost no chance. Similar to chess. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] So then why is 5 card stud not played anywhere anymore? I'm guessing that for the under 40 crowd, the most exposure they've had to 5 card stud is by watching "The Cincinnati Kid" on AMC. regards, Tim (whose only exposure to 5 stud was by watching "The Cincinnati Kid" on AMC) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Heads-up NL 5 card stud, by a mile. There is so much skill involved in it, a weaker player has almost no chance. Similar to chess. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] So then why is 5 card stud not played anywhere anymore? [/ QUOTE ] beause a weaker player has almost no chance |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Heads-up NL 5 card stud, by a mile. There is so much skill involved in it, a weaker player has almost no chance. Similar to chess. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] So then why is 5 card stud not played anywhere anymore? [/ QUOTE ] beause a weaker player has almost no chance [/ QUOTE ] all the more reason for the top players to ask for/demand it. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the classic, of course: rock paper scissors
|
![]() |
|
|