NCAA Tournament Field - Page 3

Clarkmeister · #21 03-13-2005, 07:04 PM

[ QUOTE ]
#1 seeds:

Illinois
UNC
Dook
Washington (!)

Washington's inclusion as a 1 should help the Zags.

[/ QUOTE ]

It'll be interesting to see if Wake ends up playing Illinois again or Washington, at least as far as which regional they end up in.

bugstud · #22 03-13-2005, 07:05 PM

I hoped to get them as Illini's #2

kerssens · #23 03-13-2005, 07:08 PM

[ QUOTE ]
washington... worst number 1 ever

[/ QUOTE ]

I can see the ESPN poll right now...."Which #1 will not make it to the Final Four?"

Washington will get 75% of the votes.

Clarkmeister · #24 03-13-2005, 07:10 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I hoped to get them as Illini's #2

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm guessing Wake as the #2 in Washingtons region, KU and Louisville as our 2 and 3 seeds.

Clarkmeister · #25 03-13-2005, 07:15 PM

Illinois gets a super easy 8/9 seed. BC or Bama as the 4/5, I'm pretty happy with that. Okie State got hosed as the #2 seed in the overall #1 seed regional when they could've gotten a #1 seed themselves. I like our draw though.

MicroBob · #26 03-13-2005, 07:20 PM

They got hosed a bit.
but I think they're 7 or 10 seed opponent in the 2nd round almost makes up for it as I see minimal risk there....and there are certainly many potential 7 and 10 seeds who could have posed bigger problems for them.

Agreed that Washington is a pretty weak 1 seed. Really surprised me.

I can easily see them losing to Pacific or Pitt in the 2nd round.

mason55 · #27 03-13-2005, 07:20 PM

Didn't see that Washington number 1 seed coming...

mason55 · #28 03-13-2005, 07:22 PM

[ QUOTE ]
#1 seeds:

Illinois
UNC
Dook
Washington (!)

Washington's inclusion as a 1 should help the Zags.

[/ QUOTE ]

How do you know these already?

banditbdl · #29 03-13-2005, 07:22 PM

Wow, I know I said I didn't like Pitt much, but a 9 seed for them is ridiculous, what a hose-job.

BWebb · #30 03-13-2005, 07:23 PM

Washington has a tough bracket, that's for sure.