|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is it | |||
| Jim Brown |
   
|
47 | 25.13% |
| Walter Payton |
  
|
48 | 25.67% |
| Barry Sanders |
  
|
67 | 35.83% |
| Emmit Smith |
  
|
9 | 4.81% |
| Earl Campbell |
  
|
2 | 1.07% |
| Marcus Allen |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Curtis Martin |
|
3 | 1.60% |
| Jerome Bettis |
|
2 | 1.07% |
| Bo Jackson |
|
4 | 2.14% |
| other |
|
5 | 2.67% |
| Voters: 187. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
03-14-2005, 01:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I Would Rather... (Nuclear Question)
[ QUOTE ]
It dosnt have the ability to supply its own cities with electricity 24/7 or feed its own population. Extended military campaighns are not on the agenda. ------------------------------------------------------------ I think they may in fact be on the agenda. This is part of the reason their people live without food and electricity so often. [/ QUOTE ] Well North Korea stockpiled about two years' worth of food and fuel for its massive military (while its people starved). I would think a couple years' worth of provisions for the military ought to be sufficient to allow its Army to operate a somewhat extended military campaign. 
|
|
#22
03-14-2005, 01:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I Would Rather... (Nuclear Question)
[ QUOTE ]
Well North Korea stockpiled about two years' worth of food and fuel for its massive military (while its people starved). I would think a couple years' worth of provisions for the military ought to be sufficient to allow its Army to operate a somewhat extended military campaign. [/ QUOTE ] While this is true, I am NOT entirely sure that they have the ability to effectively distribute the provisions over a large scale. I think their best bet would be to pillage provisions from the south at least in the short term should the situation come up.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
