Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-19-2005, 06:05 PM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: So Passive

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
For some reason I never wait for the "safe turn"...because Im not sure it's safe.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not suggesting that hero wait for a safe turn. I'm wondering why in this case he didn't raise this turn.

/mc

[/ QUOTE ]


because I thought there was a good chance I was drawing to 3 outs. I didn't think I had a hand worth protecting. no matter what I did, I'd have a questionable hand out of position against 2+ opponents. maybe this is a cop out, and maybe this is a good reason to fold it preflop, but that's what I did [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-19-2005, 06:06 PM
PotatoStew PotatoStew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 104
Default Re: So Passive

[ QUOTE ]
But when you play in more aggressive games where the majority of the pots are 3 or maybe 4 handed these blind defense situations become very important. Defending with a hand like 96s (or 87o or something like that), where your implied odds on flopping a pair are tremendous and your risk of domination is minimal, becoms a crucial part of the game.

[/ QUOTE ]

So is the thinking here that the initial raiser will often have medium to large connectors, or small pairs, and seeing the flop for one more bet can yield a hand that will hold up against him if he doesn't improve? And that you'll get a lot of bets with this hand, since the original raiser will tend to stay aggressive?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-19-2005, 06:12 PM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: So Passive

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But when you play in more aggressive games where the majority of the pots are 3 or maybe 4 handed these blind defense situations become very important. Defending with a hand like 96s (or 87o or something like that), where your implied odds on flopping a pair are tremendous and your risk of domination is minimal, becoms a crucial part of the game.

[/ QUOTE ]

So is the thinking here that the initial raiser will often have medium to large connectors, or small pairs, and seeing the flop for one more bet can yield a hand that will hold up against him if he doesn't improve? And that you'll get a lot of bets with this hand, since the original raiser will tend to stay aggressive?

[/ QUOTE ]

think about my relative position. if I flop a big draw, I'm in great position to check raise the field. if I flop something weak, I can often check and call one bet closing the action. I often get to see 4 cards cheap. sure, sometimes it'll come back to me for 3 or 4 bets, but a lot of the time I'll get to peel cheaply. 4 cards in a big pot for 2 SB is a good deal
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-19-2005, 06:16 PM
IndieMatty IndieMatty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Losing 4/8 Stud Player
Posts: 365
Default Re: So Passive

By betting the flop, you want MP2 to raise you so you knock MP3 and CO off their overcards.

Or you know where you stand. That's why I said in my original post that without this flop bet, you're [censored].

You can't be afraid to get raised in this game, (not saying you are) if you are passive out of position your gonna get taken advantage of.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-19-2005, 06:21 PM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: So Passive

I tend to experiment a lot when I play. it's tough because things always turn out differently, but I feel like on multiple occasions I've bet out on this flop and I've ended up on the turn with top pair, no clue where I'm at, with 3 people having position on me.

what is comes down to is you people think (1) I have a hand worth protecting, and (2) I'll be able to protect it. for some reason, on the flop, I only agree with #1, and the turn I agree with neither.

but no matter, the consensus says to bet the flop, and that's what I'll do in the future as long as it works for me
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-19-2005, 06:27 PM
IndieMatty IndieMatty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Losing 4/8 Stud Player
Posts: 365
Default Re: So Passive

This is my primary game now, and I'm either running real well, or I found my niche in life...either way, I absolutely believe you have a hand worth protecting here, could you be up against an overpair...sure..but the time to find that out is on the flop.

I posted this in Mid-High. But I mean look at this nonsense.

Preflop: Hero is BB with K, K.
UTG calls, UTG+1 raises, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 calls, CO folds, Button calls, SB 3-bets, Hero caps, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP3 calls, Button calls, SB calls.

Flop: (24 SB) J, A, T (6 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, UTG folds, UTG+1 calls, MP3 calls, SB calls, Hero calls, UTG+1 calls, MP3 calls.

Turn: (15.20 BB) J (5 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, UTG+1 calls, MP3 folds, SB calls.

River: (18.20 BB) A (4 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, UTG+1 folds, SB folds.


All I know is SB had 22.

My point is there is no set way to play this game, I can't even call it Poker sometimes.


web page
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.