|
|
#21
01-14-2005, 11:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Table selection
I play four-tables with pokertracker and playerview running. If any of the tables are complete rock gardens (almost every player under 25% VP$IP) I leave. I look for the +50% VP$IP players and follow them around if necessary. My buddy list is very long and I will often do a search for my favorites. Datamining (opening tables and watching them for hours at a time to collect data) is crucial, especially if you are preparing to jump levels. It gives you stats on thousands of players you're likely to meet in future games.
|
|
#22
01-14-2005, 12:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anybody else think like this?
I used to think that as well, but after playing at tables with mostly TA-Ns and TA-As, I've concluded that I'm not ready to learn how to beat those at this stage. In fact, I think most 5/10 players couldn't even do it. Hence, I now look for a table that is either very beatable for me, or beatable but challenging.
[ QUOTE ] If the first table is all TAG, great! I need to learn how to beat these types. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#23
01-14-2005, 05:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Table selection
[ QUOTE ]
I can dig what you guys are saying, but you need to change tables. I 4 tabled last night, and 2 of my tables were 43% and 45% average VP%IP, one was like 25 (not great) and one was about 16. (eeeewwwwww.....) I stayed at the loose ones and left the tight ones, it really is that easy. eventually I got 2 more in the 28-30 range, and I was happy with that. The three players to my right on the 45% VP$IP table were VP$IP 40, 50, and 70. BOOYA. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, GT+ is a beatiful thing. I love sitting at a 45+% VP$IP table watching someone with 80% VP%IP bust out, only to reload another $25. Cha-ching.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
