|
|
#21
11-15-2004, 12:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KJs gets 3-bet
Yes.
[ QUOTE ] And why the turn c/r? [/ QUOTE ] Cause i have top pair against PF agressive 3-bettor. Most of the time im ahead now and i suppose that hands that beating me wouldn't 3-bet turn. The only exceptions are straight with KQ and set. 
|
|
#22
11-15-2004, 12:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
than you lie - i was villian
c
|
|
#23
11-15-2004, 12:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KJs gets 3-bet
[ QUOTE ]
Cause i have top pair against PF agressive 3-bettor. Most of the time im ahead now and i suppose that hands that beating me wouldn't 3-bet turn. The only exceptions are straight with KQ and set. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I see what you are saying. Overcards would probably call the turn raise, then fold the river unimproved. Wheras by calling the turn and leading the river I -may- be able to squeeze that second bet out of the overs. By check-raising you really only get an extra bet if he has a T, but you do charge overs to draw. The thing is, I have the gutshot, and would have to call if 3-bet. Opponent had TT for the flopped set. To Packerfan, it must have been a very similar hand, but I am looking at the hand history right now, and it's definately TT.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
