Is it over??? - Page 3

challenger84 · #21 10-25-2004, 06:19 PM

1986

sublime · #22 10-25-2004, 06:20 PM

i agree with all your points

but i am not concerned with this "decided" home field advantage stuff, especially when #1 it has been proven through research that homefield advantage in baseball is the leat important of the 4 major sports, and #2 the red sox are better than either team StL "beat up" in the playoffs.

sublime · #23 10-25-2004, 06:21 PM

2004 [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

WTF does 1986 have to do with anything?

challenger84 · #24 10-25-2004, 06:21 PM

Allright, let's suspend this discussion until Thursday night. Everything will be much more clear then.

sublime · #25 10-25-2004, 06:23 PM

no
until tuesday night
when the cards face pedro

cards in 6

challenger84 · #26 10-25-2004, 06:24 PM

I don't know, I just think a lot of Red Sox fans in 1986 probably felt the same way you do right now. But if you want to talk 2004, lets talk about a certain team that was up 3-0 in a certain series. My point is just that it's way too early to act like this series is over.

challenger84 · #27 10-25-2004, 06:26 PM

[ QUOTE ]
cards in 6

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] Is this what passes for humor these days? God, I must be out of touch.

red sox in 4

There, was that funny? I'm so confused.

nolanfan34 · #28 10-25-2004, 06:40 PM

If you're really confused...

He's referencing that you can't guarantee 2 out of 3, and Cards in 6. Dat math don't add up.

I still think the Cards will win a couple of games, and we'll see how much smack Boston fans are talking then.

kyro · #29 10-25-2004, 06:42 PM

but it's ok to say it's a "fact" they will win at least 2 of 3 in STL?

The series is far from over, for sure. But our foolish dreams have a better chance of coming true than yours.

*EDIT* I'm a libelous fool

challenger84 · #30 10-25-2004, 06:45 PM

Eh, whatever. I don't think I even said Cards in 6. But yea, whatever.