Two Semi-Common Logical Fallicies: Continuation Bets

[Jman28]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I just realized that example #2 is somewhat similar to this thread started by Sklansky a while back. Much different hand, same concept.

[/ QUOTE ]\

Jesus lord why did you link to that thread. That was back when I was a huge moron and I recall making some absurd responses to it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks. I'll have to read your responses so I feel better about when I make a mistake.

We were all newbies once Curtains.

[curtains]

I wasn't actually a newbie. I was already a semi successful pro poker player. I just had a lot to learn still...

I agree with curtains. Linking to that thread is simply a very poorly disguised insult to everyone who responded dumbly. Wow, sklansky must've been really frustrated.

[curtains]

lol, Im sort of joking. I just wasnt so clear on some concepts back then, and it made it much harder for me to solve such questions. The good news is that iff a similar puzzle was presented to me now, I'd be able to solve it almost immediately.