Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-28-2004, 12:23 PM
Lurshy Lurshy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 21
Default Re: Foxwoods 10K hand

I have no problem with the play so far. Stan can easily put your friend on an overpair, and call here with a big overpair, or come back over-the-top with a smaller set.

Other plays such as a smooth call, or larger raise work as well in certain circumstances, but there is nothing fundamentally wrong with your friend's play that I see. JMHO
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-29-2004, 01:38 PM
HiatusOver HiatusOver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 122
Default RESULTS

Good discussion so far guys, I would really love to get more people to sound in on this one, because it seems like no conclusion has come and I think this situation comes up a lot early in a MTT.

Well the next part of the hand is Stan pushed in after my friend raised to 3000, my friend obviously called...what is Stans hand? And did my friend play the flop right?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:17 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: RESULTS

[ QUOTE ]
Well the next part of the hand is Stan pushed in after my friend raised to 3000, my friend obviously called...what is Stans hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

there are either 5 8's in the deck, your friend busted (our doubled up off of) Stan, or Stan hit a 1 outer.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:31 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: Foxwoods 10K hand

I believe extracting maximum value is most important in cash games while staying alive is most important in a tournament (unless there's a rebuy available, then the way you play this could change)


this is where you are clearly wrong (at least when you are far from the money).

Use the search feature...there have been many, many posts on this topic. Greg (fossilman) has a bunch of posts on this. Paul Phillips has also commented extensively on this topic. Look for posts by Fnurt, La Brujita, Che, MLG, and Cferejohn as they have argued it more elegantly than I.

when you are far from the money, for all intents and purposes chipEV = cashEV. So, giving up equity in search of survival is equatable to charity.

-SossMan
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:43 PM
sdplayerb sdplayerb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 380
Default Re: RESULTS

Stan has a set of 3s or 2s, a strfl draw or AK fl draw.

And I agree with Sossman, I would have called Stan's reraise.
Due to Stan's pushin, his line was the best, but was a very unique flop given what appears to be the hands Stan has...but usually Sossman's flat call I believe is the best play.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:59 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: RESULTS

I kind of doubt Stan put in the 3rd raise w/ out a set since he has to fear AA/KK, so I don't think he can think his overcard outs are any good. Maybe w/ Ad5d or Ad4d. I really think he has a set there, though.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-29-2004, 03:25 PM
MLG MLG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cards Happen
Posts: 727
Default Re: RESULTS

Your telling me our hero wouldnt play 99-QQ the same way? I could very easily see our opponenet having A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] here. Maybe even AQ.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-30-2004, 05:45 AM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 307
Default Re: RESULTS

Hi Sossman,

[ QUOTE ]
I kind of doubt Stan put in the 3rd raise w/ out a set since he has to fear AA/KK,

[/ QUOTE ]

He doesn't, if he has AA himself. But, to me, pushing in without a set is nuts here, unless your opponent is a fool. I think he has to have a set, or he thinks the Hero is an idiot who'll call with KK.

Assuming Stan has 33 or 22, what do people think about calling 300 pre-flop in a heads up situation? At first glance, I thought it would be too hard to get paid off appropriately, but I guess it's reasonable to assume you're gonna make 2400 to 3000 post-flop with a set. Is this an easy call pre-flop for you, Sossman, even if your opponent plays well?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-30-2004, 01:22 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: RESULTS

[ QUOTE ]
Your telling me our hero wouldnt play 99-QQ the same way? I could very easily see our opponenet having A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] here. Maybe even AQ.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think most players would make the non-allin rereraise with 99-QQ. I suppose he could have made that play, but hero sure is screaming set/AA/KK.
I would be shocked if Stan didn't have a set or AA.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-30-2004, 01:24 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: RESULTS

[ QUOTE ]
Assuming Stan has 33 or 22, what do people think about calling 300 pre-flop in a heads up situation? At first glance, I thought it would be too hard to get paid off appropriately, but I guess it's reasonable to assume you're gonna make 2400 to 3000 post-flop with a set. Is this an easy call pre-flop for you, Sossman, even if your opponent plays well?


[/ QUOTE ]

standard deep stacked play, IMO. I would call there just about every time given the stack sizes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.