#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this typical at the 400s?
[ QUOTE ]
Your math is wrong he will have AA 1% of the time (at best) AQ 10% and AK 5% this is being friendly. If he is stupid enouhgt to bet 400 with AA then ill write him a check write now. [/ QUOTE ] You're not making any sense at all. You're making up bad excuses for calling this gigantic bet with AJ which makes pushing with AA a BRILLIANT play. You're already writing him a check by making this call. SpaceAce |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this typical at the 400s?
I see loons making all-ins like this all the time but they usually have any pair, any ace, suited connectors or face cards. Unless he's literally doing this every time (ie random hand), can a call here be worth it? And yes, loons do it with AA,KK and QQ etc here.
I suggest this wasn't so much a calculated call but more likely what I call the "Fk U Factor". Not necessarily always bad. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this typical at the 400s?
[ QUOTE ]
I suggest this wasn't so much a calculated call but more likely what I call the "Fk U Factor". Not necessarily always bad. [/ QUOTE ] I'm going to disagree, here. Any time you're doing something for "Fk U", you're doing it for the wrong reaon. Sometimes Fk U and the right decision happen to coincide but it's still always bad to be doing it for Fk U. Not that I've never made a Fk U move, but I try to recognize them and keep them out of my game as much as possible. SpaceAce |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this typical at the 400s?
1. this thread is retarded.
2. this call is the nuts. 3. it would be sweet if this donkey had caught a four and won. |
|
|