#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thin 3-handed?
[ QUOTE ]
it costs you more to play your hands because the blinds come thru so much faster, so you have to get involved in more hands [/ QUOTE ] When you pay your next blind has no influence on whether the hand you hold right now is profitable to raise or not against two people holding random cards and having posted a SB and BB. I don't buy this business of more hands becoming profitable in the exact same situation in fewer handed games at all. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thin 3-handed?
[ QUOTE ]
When you pay your next blind has no influence on whether the hand you hold right now is profitable to raise or not against two people holding random cards and having posted a SB and BB. I don't buy this business of more hands becoming profitable in the exact same situation in fewer handed games at all. [/ QUOTE ] We just lose less in the blinds in a shorter game, right? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thin 3-handed?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] it costs you more to play your hands because the blinds come thru so much faster, so you have to get involved in more hands [/ QUOTE ] When you pay your next blind has no influence on whether the hand you hold right now is profitable to raise or not against two people holding random cards and having posted a SB and BB. I don't buy this business of more hands becoming profitable in the exact same situation in fewer handed games at all. [/ QUOTE ] guess I hadnt really thought about it well enough |
|
|