Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-29-2005, 10:40 AM
JerseyTom JerseyTom is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 21
Default Re: TPNK in large pot

[ QUOTE ]
In this situation though, I would probably fold to the turn raise with your kicker counterfeited and most likely splitting at best.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. You're either drawing (slim) to a split or you're completely pwned. Not good times...

I think I might have checked this flop and folded if button bet and got any overcalls.

Given the way you played it, I'm so folding the turn.


Tom
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-29-2005, 10:42 AM
Guruman Guruman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 228
Default Re: TPNK in large pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
IMO, the biggest mistake was the pf call. Even though this was a multiway hand AXs has to hit the flush draw to have much worth against multiple opponents.

...

flame goggles on.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you putting your pattern-mapping goggles on, too? If you've got the multiway pot with Axs, what else are you looking for?

[/ QUOTE ]

reads and position. I'll limp with AXs late in a passive game after 2 limpers. I'll muck it in mp after 2 limpers in an aggressive game. Hero didn't know where he was yet.

I play tight though. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-29-2005, 10:44 AM
silkyslim silkyslim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 359
Default Re: TPNK in large pot

Pf I think is fine. Can someone explain why I check/call the flop? Turn fold is the right play
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-29-2005, 10:49 AM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 87
Default Re: TPNK in large pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
IMO, the biggest mistake was the pf call. Even though this was a multiway hand AXs has to hit the flush draw to have much worth against multiple opponents.

...

flame goggles on.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you putting your pattern-mapping goggles on, too? If you've got the multiway pot with Axs, what else are you looking for?

[/ QUOTE ]

reads and position. I'll limp with AXs late in a passive game after 2 limpers. I'll muck it in mp after 2 limpers in an aggressive game. Hero didn't know where he was yet.

I play tight though. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

You mean 16/8 tight or tighter?

Axs has good value in an aggressive game because you stand to make much more in implied odds than in a passive game. In an aggressive game, a pair of aces may also win more often because players will be pushing moderate hands stronger (trying to "represent the ace").
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-29-2005, 11:03 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: TPNK in large pot

I would call the turn. Your immediate pot odds are 9.75-to-1, and I think there's a decent chance (maybe 20%??) you have him beat right now, based on the possibility that he has JJ, flush draw, or straight draw. I think that, of these possibilities, JJ is most likely because he came alive when Jack came on the turn (he could have reasonably raised pre-flop with QJs). It would also help explain why he wouldn't bet on the flop (he could have been calling based upon straight draw, backdoor flush).

Assuming he's a reasonable player, I think the most likely hands he could have raised pre-flop here are either KK or AA. He could easily be slowplaying a set of Kings or Aces on the flop.

Another distinct possibility is KJs, which would also explain why he would then bet the turn. However, I admit that I would have thought he would raise the flop with this hand, but perhaps someone can explain why that might be a good play for him???

Regardless of his most likely hands, however, a reasonable player could have QJs, and an unreasonable player could have something else entirely, thus giving you a good enough chance to call the turn IMHO.

Also IMHO: I question why you would call the pre-flop raise with A3s.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-29-2005, 11:08 AM
silkyslim silkyslim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 359
Default Re: TPNK in large pot

[ QUOTE ]
Also IMHO: I question why you would call the pre-flop raise with A3s.


[/ QUOTE ]
I had already limped when he raised, so I called for 1 more bet.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-29-2005, 11:15 AM
@bsolute_luck @bsolute_luck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi...I\'m in Delaware
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: TPNK in large pot

[ QUOTE ]
Pf I think is fine. Can someone explain why I check/call the flop? Turn fold is the right play

[/ QUOTE ]

what cards are you scared of coming on the turn that would fold to your 1 bet on the flop? they're already drawing thin, plus what hands do you think Button has that he'll reraise you with? probably only hands that beat you and if i had AA-KK, i'd simply call too knowing the rest of the field is drawing nearly dead.

i think there's more to it too, but that's all i got right now [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-29-2005, 11:16 AM
Guruman Guruman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 228
Default Re: TPNK in large pot

[ QUOTE ]

Also IMHO: I question why you would call the pre-flop raise with A3s.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you're in, you're in and you're getting great odds to call and flop a flush draw. The rule of thumb is usually that you should never limp with a hand that cant stand to call a raise.

I see the arguments that I'm getting here for limping in the first place, but I still prefer to limp with weak suited aces late as opposed to middle. Mucking preflop would have saved us from an ugly situation where the aggressor ended up behind us.

I think if you're going to check/fold the flop when you spike your ace here (not a particularly bad plan btw), you should have just folded preflop anyway.

Again, we've got no table image and no reads - so who know what anyone thinks about our calls and raises here. Walking around in the dark...
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-29-2005, 11:18 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: TPNK in large pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
IMO, the biggest mistake was the pf call. Even though this was a multiway hand AXs has to hit the flush draw to have much worth against multiple opponents.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree.

you have 2 two limpers before you in MP2 and SSHE has this as a call in MP even for tight games. your chances of having at least a (weak) ovecard + BDFD are huge + you can easily discard if you didn't hit anything. I never fold this in MP with 2 limpers before me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought the advice in SSHE (keeping in mind it's just a general rule) was to call an unraised pot with A3s from middle (or any) position, and to only call a raise from late position if 4 had entered the pot before you???
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-29-2005, 11:24 AM
Fantam Fantam is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: England
Posts: 4
Default Re: TPNK in large pot

[ QUOTE ]
Pf I think is fine. Can someone explain why I check/call the flop? Turn fold is the right play

[/ QUOTE ]

On the flop, no overcards can come to your A top pair, so it is relatively difficult for someone to draw out on you if you are ahead. So it is not as important to worry about trying to knock players out.

And if you are behind, check/calling costs you the least bets to see a showdown.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.