|
|
#21
05-31-2005, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A9s vs PFR
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yes, you have the button, but postflop you will have the worst relative position since CO is the aggressor. [/ QUOTE ] What if UTG raises and then there are 4 coldcallers to you on the button? [/ QUOTE ] I'd much rather cold-call in both cases with JTs than A9s, and not just because I'd flop a full house. You really want to have more than just a flush to play with, and A9s is just too likely to be dominated. A suited connector or a pocket pair would be an easy call though. 
|
|
#22
05-31-2005, 02:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A9s vs PFR
[ QUOTE ]
I'd much rather cold-call in both cases with JTs than A9s, and not just because I'd flop a full house. [/ QUOTE ] POTD! [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [ QUOTE ] You really want to have more than just a flush to play with, and A9s is just too likely to be dominated. A suited connector or a pocket pair would be an easy call though. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed 100%.
|
|
#23
05-31-2005, 03:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A9s vs PFR
I haven't played .5/1 in a while, so I don't have a feel for the 'typical' player, but ...
Without any reads it is hard to know, but I think you all may be seriously overestimating the PRFs hand. Even if he wasn't a poster, there are a huge number of hands he could profitably raise here (20% or more of his possible hands). As a poster, his propensity to raise may be even higher than normal. Against me, I would 3-bet with A9s.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
