Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-12-2005, 09:47 AM
fsuplayer fsuplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 187
Default Re: 64 suited

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I fold preflop

[/ QUOTE ]

This is almost a clear mistake in the party 2k game. The amount of money you can win with hands like this if you have the right aggression postflop makes this an autocall for me, and sometimes I might raise it.

-Jason

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree somewhat. In my experience you are thinking about the times you hit gorgeous flops, not the 15 times in a row you didn't hit even the smallest piece of the board.

However, that's not to say I don't call here.

[/ QUOTE ]

if you are only playing this to flop trips or the nuts, then yes, its a fold pf.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-12-2005, 12:42 PM
chuddo chuddo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 20
Default Re: 64 suited

el d: as played without building a bigger pot on turn and decreasing the stacks, are you still pushing this river?

everyone else: what range are you putting villain on, and more importantly what range of calling % are you putting him on?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:34 PM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: 64 suited

[ QUOTE ]
i like this push much better with a missed flush draw.

i would bet 3/4 pot here.

your line looks so strong, I would be shocked if you got a call from one pair here.

[/ QUOTE ]

1886*.75 = 1415.

2472 - 78 - 234 - 567 = 1593.

I would put in that extra 180 every time and think not doing so is just setting money on fire.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:37 PM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: 64 suited

[ QUOTE ]
el d: as played without building a bigger pot on turn and decreasing the stacks, are you still pushing this river?

everyone else: what range are you putting villain on, and more importantly what range of calling % are you putting him on?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sometimes I'll push, other times I'll bet half pot. Depends on what's been going on lately.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-12-2005, 03:40 PM
ggbman ggbman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 605
Default Preflop...

Just to be clear, i didn't consider this to be a "standard" call preflop. It's one of those things i was doing to try and keep my opponents off balance, this hand definitly hits the muck some of the time. Additionally, i had been picking up a lot of pots playing draws aggressivly, and on the flop, i just felt confident that he had an overpair, not overcards, so it seemed like a bad spot to get aggressive.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-12-2005, 07:01 PM
fsuplayer fsuplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 187
Default Re: 64 suited

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i like this push much better with a missed flush draw.

i would bet 3/4 pot here.

your line looks so strong, I would be shocked if you got a call from one pair here.

[/ QUOTE ]

1886*.75 = 1415.

2472 - 78 - 234 - 567 = 1593.

I would put in that extra 180 every time and think not doing so is just setting money on fire.

[/ QUOTE ]

thats twice you've caught me not paying attention posting while playing this morning.

i just added it up and agree a push is just fine here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.