Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-20-2005, 08:25 PM
Jax_Grinder Jax_Grinder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: River City
Posts: 395
Default Re: RAYMER...not so good?

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-21-2005, 04:00 AM
Alex/Mugaaz Alex/Mugaaz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 403
Default Re: RAYMER...not so good?

nh
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-21-2005, 01:53 PM
slamdunkpro slamdunkpro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Springfield VA
Posts: 544
Default Re: RAYMER...not so good?

Greg,

Ignore the critics!

BTW I hope we have the chance to speak nexr time you are in AC. I missed you last time because you were busy talking to the Taj floor guys and the tournament had started back up.

Best wishes
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-23-2005, 02:07 PM
aggie aggie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1
Default Re: RAYMER...not so good?

I’ve only read the original post and Raymer’s reply but since I’ve played with Raymer on 3 occasions I figured I’d give my opinion.

The first time I played with Greg dates back a couple of years and was my first time playing in the 5-5 pot limit holdem game at Foxwoods. I immediately noticed greg because he had far and away the largest stack at the table (mostly cash). He seemed to play in every pot and was both winning and losing some big ones. I had a hard time figuring out whether raymer was just a maniac or a calculating / winning player. By the end of the session I decided on the latter.

The second time I played with Greg, he sat to my left. We were both pretty deep (he was far deeper than i)…When I was in the SB I reraised a late position raiser with AA. Raymer studied long and hard before mucking his hand. When I showed the table my hand raymer seemed disappointed that he hadn’t called with his 4-5 suited. He said Aces are exactly the hand he wanted to be against with his hand. That comment hammered home the concept of implied odds in NLHE for me.

I was also very impressed in my final session with him, a very short 10-25nlhe session I played with Raymer (since the WSOP). I have since also read all of Raymer’s archived 2+2 posts and one thing is clear…Dude know’s what he’s talking about….I’ve spoken to many of the very good NLHE players at foxwoods that have played with him and the consensus seems to be that he’s a hell of a player.

The only real negative I see in Raymer’s game is his willingness to talk strategy at the table and possibly his ego (which he constantly defends on this forum). That said, he seems to have great money management and game selection skills, and I doubt he’d play above his head. Even before he was famous watching greg play and listening to him at the table made me a better player. For that, I am greatful!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-23-2005, 03:08 PM
MMMMMM MMMMMM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: RAYMER...not so good?

From what I have seen at Foxwoods: Greg generally did quite well in the live No-Limit games a few years ago (that being the time period when I was sometimes playing in those games).
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-23-2005, 11:44 PM
MaxPower MaxPower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Land of Chocolate
Posts: 1,323
Default Re: RAYMER...not so good?

I generally believe about 5% of what I hear in a card room.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-24-2005, 08:12 AM
Myrtle Myrtle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 388
Default Re: RAYMER...not so good?

[ QUOTE ]
I generally believe about 5% of what I hear in a card room.

[/ QUOTE ]

One has to be able to recognize excellence before one can make comments about it. Kind of like an algebra student proffering opinions on quantum mechanics.

How many of the FW regulars can truly do that?

A handfull, IMO.....Based upon what I know about the players there.....around 5-10% seems right.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-24-2005, 09:32 AM
Martin Aigner Martin Aigner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vienna / Austria
Posts: 363
Default Re: RAYMER...not so good?

Guess he really is a sucker
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.