This final table commentary with Greenstein and Raymer..

[Muck off]

where are u gys listenin to this at

[ononimo]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't care if he's humble or not - I just wish he'd stop interrupting others while they are talking. He ran over Greg on countless occasions and, contrary to what Barry may think, there were many people who were interested in hearing what Greg had to say.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was out of synch initially, not knowing when Greg was done with his thought. If you stuck with it, you will notice that I eventually asked Greg first if he wanted to answer each question as it came up, and toward the end, I was pretty silent as Greg told his stories.

I have no disrespect for Greg, and I think one WSOP final bracelet is more than the sum total of about anything else in the poker world. And he even made a valiant run at a repeat.

Sorry I occasionally interfered during the broadcast.

Barry

[/ QUOTE ]

fair enough - i should have realized that coordinating a 4-way phone conversation when you are in seperate locations can often be problematic.

at times during the broadcast, it seemed like you were dismissive of Greg but it's good to hear that you respect him as a player, just as he respects you.

despite my criticisms, i want you to know how much your participation was appreciated.

[Neil Stevens]

[ QUOTE ]
I was out of synch initially, not knowing when Greg was done with his thought. If you stuck with it, you will notice that I eventually asked Greg first if he wanted to answer each question as it came up, and toward the end, I was pretty silent as Greg told his stories.

[/ QUOTE ]
I guess the problem here is that some people expect you to be as good a broadcaster as you are a poker player. You might take it as a weird compliment!

[MicroBob]

Barry...I did not think you were arrogant (seems like I might have been the only one).
And yes, I did notice that you were constantly trying to defer to Greg.
It seemed like a VERY friendly conversation between two guys who have a lot of respect for each other's opinions and abilities.


There were interesting issues that came up and you clearly had some enthusiasm for your opinion so you were engaged in a debate with Greg a couple of times (regarding short-table play for example).


I thought the broadcast was terrific.
I didn't give a damn who won the WCOOP championship...I stayed up all night listening to you guys because the conversation was so intelligent and engaging (pretty much the same as the previous Sunday...except this time it was you WITH Greg).


To the point of Barry's supposed arrogance: Hello?? He really IS one of the best players in the world. He isn't even saying this much but we all know it to be true.

The concept of cutting one's way through a large field of mostly amateur players IS relevant. Sometimes you are playing against a good player...and other times you are playing against a bad player. That's just how it is.
Also relevant is the subject of how much the WPT and online-play has changed the game.


For Barry to pretend like he is just another amateur player would be ridiculous.
The big cash-game IS different and many people are interested in hearing what he has to say.


I look at Barry's ideas about playing in the big-game at the 'next level' to be no different than a baseball major-league manager or player talking about some young upstart trying to make it at the 'next level'.
You wouldn't think that a baseball manager or player would be arrogant if he was talking about a kid just up from the minor-leagues about 'needing time to learn the game at this level'.
Barry isn't talking down to ANYONE.
It's just fact that winning at the highest levels in poker takes a different set of abilities.


To the point of the supposed interruptions: It is indeed difficult on a 4-way phone conversation where the guys have never really worked with each other before.
Interruptions are going to happen.


In many of the 3-man broadcast booths in football for example it would not be uncommon at all for the play-by-play guy to point to the announcer who is to speak next (or for one of the announcers to hold up a finger to indicate that they have an idea they would like to interject).

I've done this in 2 person sports-broadcasts actually (pointing to the other guy when my thought is done so that he can jump right in quickly without fear of interruption).

This is not possible in the conference phone-call format obviously.


Barry and Greg engaged in some of the most interesting on-air poker-chat I have ever heard.
Sure beat most (if not everything) of what is said in most of the 'water-down for the totally clueless' TV broadcasts on ESPN, WPT and Fox.


Please don't listen to the nay-sayers Barry.
Every announcer everywhere gets loads of criticism from people who think they could do better.
I think you and Greg both did a fine job and hope to hear more and more from you guys in the future.

[Python49]

[ QUOTE ]
I was out of synch initially, not knowing when Greg was done with his thought. If you stuck with it, you will notice that I eventually asked Greg first if he wanted to answer each question as it came up, and toward the end, I was pretty silent as Greg told his stories.

I have no disrespect for Greg, and I think one WSOP final bracelet is more than the sum total of about anything else in the poker world. And he even made a valiant run at a repeat.

Sorry I occasionally interfered during the broadcast.

Barry

[/ QUOTE ]

I do want to mention though that overall I thought the commentary was great and the only reason I stayed up also was to listen to yours and gregs words of wisdom. It didnt seem as though you were maliciously doing anything and you certainly aren't at the level of mike matusow, I thought mostly all of what you were saying was very intelligent and great insight. I guess the fact you were cutting off alot of what he was saying is why I got the impression a few times of you being condenscending but overall though you guys had great conversation. I guess in you trying to express the difference between beating the best in the world and beating amatuers this is what made it somewhat come across the way it did. But overall though you seemed very well spoken and knowledgable and im sure everyone appreciates your commentary as it made the WCOOP that much more exciting.

[Freudian]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Whatever the case, I wish he would zip it up and learn a little something called humility.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand why his humbleness is so important. Furthermore it makes the show more entertaining.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't care if he's humble or not - I just wish he'd stop interrupting others while they are talking. He ran over Greg on countless occasions and, contrary to what Barry may think, there were many people who were interested in hearing what Greg had to say.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was out of synch initially, not knowing when Greg was done with his thought. If you stuck with it, you will notice that I eventually asked Greg first if he wanted to answer each question as it came up, and toward the end, I was pretty silent as Greg told his stories.

I have no disrespect for Greg, and I think one WSOP final bracelet is more than the sum total of about anything else in the poker world. And he even made a valiant run at a repeat.

Sorry I occasionally interfered during the broadcast.

Barry

[/ QUOTE ]

But I think trying to mix in Big Game strategy when the discussion is about tournament strategy becomes annoying.

I know you are on a permanent crusade to recruit players into your game but I think the discussions yesterday would have benefitted from only being about tournament play.

Other than that I was listening with great interest and I think confidence sometimes get confused for arrogance (and sometimes not).

[Quicksilvre]

Thanks for responding. I'd like to hear what Greg has to say about this--not because I don't believe you, but I am curious of what he thinks.

[schwza]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Whatever the case, I wish he would zip it up and learn a little something called humility.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand why his humbleness is so important. Furthermore it makes the show more entertaining.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't care if he's humble or not - I just wish he'd stop interrupting others while they are talking. He ran over Greg on countless occasions and, contrary to what Barry may think, there were many people who were interested in hearing what Greg had to say.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was out of synch initially, not knowing when Greg was done with his thought. If you stuck with it, you will notice that I eventually asked Greg first if he wanted to answer each question as it came up, and toward the end, I was pretty silent as Greg told his stories.

I have no disrespect for Greg, and I think one WSOP final bracelet is more than the sum total of about anything else in the poker world. And he even made a valiant run at a repeat.

Sorry I occasionally interfered during the broadcast.

Barry

[/ QUOTE ]

2+2 is crazy because you can badmouth a celebrity/superstar you've never met and they might respond.

oh yeah, and make the OP look like a total tool by giving a reasonable, humble response.

[Ulysses]

I thought Barry's commentary was great. Greg provided what I expect from Greg, solid, reasoned, measured analysis. Barry provided the same type of insight that he provided in his book, a glimpse into the thought process and attitude of someone who gambles at the highest of levels. Both were very good, but while they both have a strategic understanding of the game, they clearly approach the game from different perspectives.

My favorite part of the commentary was Barry clarifying the fact that even before being a poker bigshot he never had any problems always getting beautiful, intelligent women. Go Barry!