|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs
textbook check.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs
"textbook check."
i like how you always avoid the real issue. namely, how do you play the rest of the hand after the "textbook check". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs
One thing that people haven't addressed in this thread is how this particular hand plays at 20-40. IMO, this is a very easy turn check. Many players in this game peel with crap because they "know you have ace high", but will relish the oppurtunity to take you off JJ when you check here. You often get them to put money in drawing dead. While this ace sucks, given the amount of money in the pot, you have a very showdownable hand. You can check call the turn and river again ALMOST all players here, there are some in the 20 game who wont fire the river barrel without and ace.
If the turn goes check check, bet/call the river. You get bluff raised far to often to bet/fold with this fishy action. Additionally, oftentimes a hand like a medium or small pair might check behind the turn, but make a crying call on the river, whereas they would have just folded the turn if you bet. Gabe |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs
I don't think the decision in these situations is based on "will he call with a worse hand" etc. It's based on whether or not you want to show it down.
If based on your reads you're comfortable not getting there and folding to a raise, bet. If you want to show it down, you want to do it for 0-2 bets like Stox said. Betting just leaves you open to maybe paying 3 to get there. If turn is check/check then river is bet/call. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs
I agreed with Stox. I merely pointed out that checking the turn sometimes extracts value from hands that would have folded to turn bet, but now bluff or make a crying river call. Believe, this fact is not insignificant.
|
|
|