|
View Poll Results: Which book is most applicable for Party Poker 15/30 hold'em? | |||
Hold'em Poker for Advanced Players | 11 | 36.67% | |
Small Stakes Hold'em | 12 | 40.00% | |
Inside the Poker Mind | 0 | 0% | |
Middle Limit Hold'em Poker | 2 | 6.67% | |
Other | 5 | 16.67% | |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Update 4
What the hell kind of easy class is this? All my classes to date would require a week of solid reading to get through all the materials. That said, I've got a tax final on Friday I've not even cracked the book for. Ugh. I did attend about half the time though...
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Update 4
It's Canada . . .
I kid, I kid. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Update 4
Does your professor put old exams for check-out in the library? That's a good way to get a feel for how screwed you are.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Exam report
All right,
so I went to bed at around 4 am, hoping to get about 4 hours of sleep. I tossed until about 6, then zonked right out for about 2 hours. I made it to the exam with time to spare. The format was what I expected, one drafting excercise (draft a few charitable trusts, etc.), one question about duties owed by trustees to beneficiaries, and one policy question. All together, I'd give it about a 5/10 for difficulty. The drafting and the policy went fairly well, but the duties question was a bit weak. I ended up getting lost in a somewhat obscure argument about the relevance of pre-Confederation decisions from English courts and their applicability to modern trust law, but somewhat steered myself back on course. If I had to guess, I'd put my performance at about a B or B-. Definitely not an A, but definitely not a C either. Ok, off to bed. -Diplomat |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Exam report
[ QUOTE ]
If I had to guess, I'd put my performance at about a B or B-. Definitely not an A, but definitely not a C either. [/ QUOTE ] Do you consider that a success or not? |
|
|