|
View Poll Results: PUPPIES! | |||
Maja | 5 | 3.88% | |
Elvis | 10 | 7.75% | |
Rocky | 4 | 3.10% | |
Stormy | 5 | 3.88% | |
Kelsey | 6 | 4.65% | |
Casey | 1 | 0.78% | |
Nacho | 14 | 10.85% | |
Herbie | 9 | 6.98% | |
Rusty | 12 | 9.30% | |
Sarge | 4 | 3.10% | |
Flash | 2 | 1.55% | |
Roxie | 10 | 7.75% | |
Jasper | 4 | 3.10% | |
Mickey | 3 | 2.33% | |
Petey | 3 | 2.33% | |
Red | 7 | 5.43% | |
Jinx | 3 | 2.33% | |
Clover | 3 | 2.33% | |
Jiffy | 5 | 3.88% | |
Tango | 3 | 2.33% | |
I don't like dogs- cause i'm a buthole | 6 | 4.65% | |
Hey- shut up down there, what was the question? | 3 | 2.33% | |
My keyboard is all sticky from those pictures | 7 | 5.43% | |
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep 3/6NL: CAll all in preflop with AQs?
[ QUOTE ]
Please give me an example of a hand that AQs beats but is an insignificant favorite over. Either you are ahead, even money or buried. [/ QUOTE ] That's my point we are getting all in with AQs, which when all in preflop is probably not that huge of a favorite against villians hand range. Probably a favorite yes, but not a big one. [ QUOTE ] Then define "wrong". Do you mean the specific hand or your whole pattern is wrong? What hands do you require to call in this situation? AA, KK? [/ QUOTE ] Did I use the word "wrong" in my post? I'm just saying that the concept of passing up a small +EV edge to wait for a bigger +EV edge has relevance here. B/C it is a capped buy-in it is very important to have a big stack and have the fish covered, so we make a ton of money when we get in as a huge favorite. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep 3/6NL: CAll all in preflop with AQs?
I believe this is by far the best strategy. At a single buy-in you could afford to take several shots. Deep stacked you need to have patience. I don't put my stack of 3-4 buy-ins at risk in this situation unless I believe I am the favorite unimproved, which I think is AA, KK, QQ. Not AK.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep 3/6NL: CAll all in preflop with AQs?
[ QUOTE ]
At a single buy-in you could afford to take several shots. Deep stacked you need to have patience. [/ QUOTE ] This is an excellent point. What are your thoughts on folding JJ /AK/AQs here and taking the risk of letting UTG ($1500) wake up with a hand and stack villian before I can? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep 3/6NL: CAll all in preflop with AQs?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] At a single buy-in you could afford to take several shots. Deep stacked you need to have patience. [/ QUOTE ] This is an excellent point. What are your thoughts on folding JJ /AK/AQs here and taking the risk of letting UTG ($1500) wake up with a hand and stack villian before I can? [/ QUOTE ] huh? if UTG "wakes up" I assume you mean he has a very strong hand. I don't think his calling range is going to be much wider than TT+, AK, AQs, maybe AJs and AQo? It's not like you're gonna want to be in a 3 way pot with him, maniac and your AQs anyway. Plus if UTG is willing to call here with a hand like AJs that you do beat, it's possible that he loses, and then you end up with a ton of money in the fishes pocket and a massive tilter. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep 3/6NL: CAll all in preflop with AQs?
I didn't mean a 3-way pot. I just meant me folding my AQ only to have UTG stack villian on the next hand. Good points made about villian winning and having a massive tilter.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep 3/6NL: CAll all in preflop with AQs?
this is a call... especially if its on stars (where you can use the rebuy trick to quickly cover him agian)
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep 3/6NL: CAll all in preflop with AQs?
was on party.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep 3/6NL: CAll all in preflop with AQs?
i think you gotta call here, its just not too likely that he has you beat.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep 3/6NL: CAll all in preflop with AQs?
Calling is the correct move I believe, but I have a feeling he has something like AJ and will spike a flush.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep 3/6NL: CAll all in preflop with AQs?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How are these hands remotely interesting? [/ QUOTE ] It's not at all interesting. It's a very simple math/logic problem. -Diplomat [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|