|
|
#21
11-16-2005, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who has the most posts?
[ QUOTE ]
No you're right he does. And maybe this is before OOT took off - but back in the day Ulysses posted a ridiculous amount of strategy posts (all awesome), I think more than El Diablo does. [/ QUOTE ] split the mid/hi forum and he would post more. 
|
|
#22
11-16-2005, 02:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who has the most posts?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No you're right he does. And maybe this is before OOT took off - but back in the day Ulysses posted a ridiculous amount of strategy posts (all awesome), I think more than El Diablo does. [/ QUOTE ] split the mid/hi forum and he would post more. [/ QUOTE ] Ah - I see. Well, anyway he plays way higher than me for it to be super relevant to my game - I just miss the days when great Ulysses strat posts (Fossilman too) occurred with very high frequency...
|
|
#24
11-16-2005, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who has the most posts?
One reason I ask this is because the other forum took away the feature that displays the user's post count next to his post. They said that a lot of people where "post whoring" and posting all over the place with no content to try to get a high count.
Seems silly why anyone really cares about post count enough to cheat to make it higher. I just always thought the post count feature was a nice way to see who spent the most time contributing to the site. I am not really surprised though. This other forum is more strict and frowns on any swears words also. Kinda tame, imo.
|
|
#25
11-16-2005, 03:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who has the most posts?
Isn't jakethebake's plan obvious?
He has about 19,850 posts, way ahead of the number 2 contestant. He will wait until someone gets to about 19,700 posts and someone here points out how close the contest to 20,000 posts is going to be. Then jake will post like heck and win the coveted title of first to reach 20,000 posts, and surpass ThaSaltCracka in the hearts and minds of OOT. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#26
11-16-2005, 03:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who has the most posts?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] but thankfully he is [censored] [/ QUOTE ] he wasn't [censored] [/ QUOTE ] Yes he was. This is from his profile (viewable by mods only). banned by [censored], almost 20k posts without one once of content. When jakethebake e-mailed me several days later, I lifted the banned temporarily under the condition that he contact both [censored] and Mat Sklansky immediately. [censored] was already on vacation at the time. It doesn't seem possible for mods to view a top posters list. The whole Admin section is different after the most recent upgrade. In fact, the Admin sections seems to be the main reason for the upgrade
|
|
#28
11-16-2005, 04:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who has the most posts?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] but thankfully he is [censored] [/ QUOTE ] he wasn't [censored] [/ QUOTE ] Yes he was. This is from his profile (viewable by mods only). banned by [censored], almost 20k posts without one once of content. [/ QUOTE ] Nice banning comment. First - the obvious misspelling. Second - I'm betting [censored] didn't read all the posts to know this. Third - the statement is completely biased. Fourth - who is [censored] to think he can make such a determination for the readers of and contributors to OOT?
|
|
#29
11-16-2005, 04:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who has the most posts?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] but thankfully he is [censored] [/ QUOTE ] he wasn't [censored] [/ QUOTE ] Yes he was. This is from his profile (viewable by mods only). banned by [censored], almost 20k posts without one once of content. [/ QUOTE ] That's really pathetic. Jake made *tons* of content-rich posts. His replies with low content were no worse and no better than 99% of the other posters on here, and I can't recall him ever posting anything that I'd consider ban-worthy.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
