Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-28-2005, 03:48 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How to Prove Locke, Berkeley, and Hume Wrong

[ QUOTE ]
It would make a sound. Sound is physical. It is molecules pushing against other molecules. Theoretically, you should be able to walk into the forest after the fact with very sensitive instruments and tell which sounds have been made and where they came from.

[/ QUOTE ]

Molecules pushing don't make sound -- an eardrum vibrating (and the brain interpreting) based on those waves creates the sound. No observer = no sound (if sound is defined as interpreting a "noise").
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-28-2005, 03:52 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How to Prove Locke, Berkeley, and Hume Wrong

Conceded.
I was defining sound as a compression wave and nothing more.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-28-2005, 03:56 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How to Prove Locke, Berkeley, and Hume Wrong

[ QUOTE ]
Conceded.
I was defining sound as a compression wave and nothing more.

[/ QUOTE ]

concur in that case
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.