Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-31-2005, 11:35 PM
Dave G. Dave G. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 616
Default Re: QQ: Still lost in these situations

Oh yes, I seem to have interpreted it as refering to the turn. My mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-31-2005, 11:49 PM
Angrymoog Angrymoog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 45
Default Re: QQ: Still lost in these situations

The only thing I have to disagree with is that loose passive players bet weak pairs on the river after you check. Yes, there is definately a predominate type of fish that plays like this, but if they bet when checked to, they arent exactly passive. That's what I thought the definition of passive was. Maybe theyre only passive when OOP?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-31-2005, 11:49 PM
KingOtter KingOtter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 667
Default Re: QQ: Still lost in these situations

[ QUOTE ]
Been playing .5/1 on and off for the past 8 months and I still feel really lost when this happens.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty much I bet until I hit resistence on these cases. With my move up to 1/2 I'm getting duped a little bit more because the players are trickier, so I may start changing my strategy on these a bit (I've no clue how, yet), but honestly this is one of the risks you take being an aggressive player. Oh well... next time you'll have AA and take him.

Sometimes you hit that third Q on the turn or river and he will have wished he raised you early on to get you to fold (which is why giving free cards / slowplaying is bad... unless you truly have a monster).

KO
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-01-2005, 01:22 PM
Delzek15 Delzek15 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 44
Default Re: QQ: Still lost in these situations

Correct... Value bet the river. No one has shown any aggression or sign of a K nor has any draw been completed except an unusual runner runner straight. Bet here.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-01-2005, 01:40 PM
silkyslim silkyslim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 359
Default Re: QQ: Still lost in these situations

Do you have SSH? There is a hand quiz very much like this. It says to value bet. So thats what I'd do (because I agree with Mioller's reasoning) pg. 304, #6 River play.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-01-2005, 04:37 PM
TomBrooks TomBrooks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: .5/1 Full Hand
Posts: 671
Default Re: QQ: Still lost in these situations

[ QUOTE ]
SSH hand quiz pg. 304, #6 River play.

[/ QUOTE ]
Hi Slim:

Three significant differences between this hand and the SSH example.

1. Hero here has two opponents on the river, in the SSH example there is only one.

2. Hero here is OOP. In SSH he has position.

3. Hero here had two cold callers. In SSH the two callers came from the blinds where people can be more loose with their calls.

Hero in this hand is in a far more tenuous position than in the example from SSH.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-01-2005, 04:49 PM
hizo1 hizo1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: fixing hearts and breaking others
Posts: 48
Default Re: QQ: Still lost in these situations

Thanks, I don't remember that hand at all! I think I have to read SSHE again once I get it back from the guy I lent it to.

Being the weak tight river player that I am (grrrr) I checked and it got checked through. I think the donks showed J9 (sooted) and 88 and MHIG.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.