Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Arrested Development or The Cosby Show
(6) Arrested Development 146 50.52%
(11) The Cosby Show 143 49.48%
Voters: 289. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:21 PM
imported_The Vibesman imported_The Vibesman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Smokin\' With Bacall
Posts: 895
Default Re: Who\'s More Successful? SNL Edition

[ QUOTE ]
This success you speak of is what exactly? Indie cred? He has undoubtedly made some great movies over the years. Somehow, the absolute stinkers and mail-ins go completely unnoticed. Regardless, a solid 30 year career is nowhere near as successful as being the biggest star in the world for a decade.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Outside of Ghostbusters, Stripes, and Groundhog Day, Murray's pictures have not done great boxoffice.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it's gotta be Murphy. He was the biggest thing in the prime of his career, and ushered in stand-up comedy's most successful era. Every stand-up comedian wanted to be Eddie Murphy, to come on stage to explosions and dancers, wearing a leather suit in front of a packed Madison Square Garden. He was a stand-up comedian that was as big as a rock star. As a movie star he was also A-list, one of the top paid film stars of his era, and every film was a guaranteed hit because he was in it. Beverly Hills Cop was one of the biggest movies ever, still 42st on top grossing movies of all time (Ghostbusters made almost 4 million more, but was not carried by Murray alone), and even the terrible sequel Bev Hills Cop II did better than superior movies like Gremlins, Lethal Weapon II and True Lies.

I also considered Mike Myers, due to the big success of Wayne's World, Shrek and the massive success of the Austin Powers films. But, despite his movie success, Mike never affected the world of stand-up the way Eddie did. It is however worth noting, when talking of "success" that there are four Mike Myers movies in the top 100 all-time grosses: Shrek II (3rd), Shrek (27th) and the 2nd and 3rd Austin Powers movies (58th and 55th respectively.)

So for me it's Eddie Murphy 1st and Mike Myers 2nd. If Steve Martin counts I'd put him 3rd, but he wasn't really a cast member.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:24 PM
Asufiji2004 Asufiji2004 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 49
Default Re: Who\'s More Successful? SNL Edition

[ QUOTE ]
An oscar nomination is pretty serious cred for a former comic.

[/ QUOTE ]

Beverly Hills cop did 230 million in 1984. His total US gross is approached 3 billion. Way more impressive.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:27 PM
Soul Daddy Soul Daddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hurricanes, animal corpses and your potential new tattoo have a lot in common. Think about it.
Posts: 463
Default Re: Who\'s More Successful? SNL Edition

[ QUOTE ]
It is however worth noting, when talking of "success" that there are four Mike Myers movies in the top 100 all-time grosses: Shrek II (3rd), Shrek (27th) and the 2nd and 3rd Austin Powers movies (58th and 55th respectively.)

[/ QUOTE ]
Nice post. I do think I tend to underrate Myers. Not my cup of tea, but he has had a very good run. It's also worth noting that Murphy is featured in two of those movies as well.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:29 PM
tdarko tdarko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: watching channel 9
Posts: 824
Default Re: Who\'s More Successful? SNL Edition

i voted eddie murphy b/c its the correct answer though i like murray the most.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:30 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Who\'s More Successful? SNL Edition

Box office wise which basically correlates with popularity, Adam Sandler has been much more successful than many of you seem to be giving him credit for. He has been among the elite club of top paid actors for many years now and most importantly his movies are often very low budget which means his backend take of the profits is huge. I think only Murphy and Myers could possibly have made more money but my guess is still Sandler.

However, I'd put him toward the bottom of this list as far as how much I've enjoyed his movies compared to the others.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:30 PM
imported_The Vibesman imported_The Vibesman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Smokin\' With Bacall
Posts: 895
Default Re: Who\'s More Successful? SNL Edition

[ QUOTE ]
An oscar nomination is pretty serious cred for a former comic.

[/ QUOTE ]

But that doesn't equal "success." Plus it's just one role.

I read an interview with Steve Martin recently, for the release of his Pink Panther film (before it was pushed back to February release hell.) Steve, who has done some dramatic roles recently, was asked what he thought was harder, comedy or drama. Steve's reply (going from memory, so paraphrased):

Comedy is harder, it's really no contest. Listen, I have a friend, a comedian, who was getting acclaim for a dramatic role he did. I asked him, I said, "You're getting a lot of acclaim for this, that's great, was it tough?" He said, "Steve, comedy is so much harder. I'm getting great reviews because I stared at someone without blinking. And the only reason I was able to do it is because I was thinking about what I would have for dinner that night."


Personally, I immediately thought that Steve's friend was Bill Murray and the film was Lost in Translation. This story is neither here nor there, but I thought it was funny.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:32 PM
M2d M2d is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: california
Posts: 660
Default Re: Who\'s More Successful? SNL Edition


what the hell? where am I
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:33 PM
mmbt0ne mmbt0ne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 700
Default Re: Who\'s More Successful? SNL Edition

</font><blockquote><font class="small">En réponse à:</font><hr />
I think its interesting to see how we judge "success". Personally, if Eddie Murphy had died in a car crash in 1988, he wins this poll easily.

[/ QUOTE ]

If success = money (which is pretty much my barometer) Murphy takes this one hands down.

If success = most talented, then we can get into a discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:36 PM
Army Eye Army Eye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 75
Default Re: Who\'s More Successful? SNL Edition

[ QUOTE ]

I also considered Mike Myers, due to the big success of Wayne's World, Shrek and the massive success of the Austin Powers films. But, despite his movie success, Mike never affected the world of stand-up the way Eddie did. It is however worth noting, when talking of "success" that there are four Mike Myers movies in the top 100 all-time grosses: Shrek II (3rd), Shrek (27th) and the 2nd and 3rd Austin Powers movies (58th and 55th respectively.)

So for me it's Eddie Murphy 1st and Mike Myers 2nd. If Steve Martin counts I'd put him 3rd, but he wasn't really a cast member.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, Mike Myers goes not get credit for the SHREK movies. Come on now. Mike is pretty much a one-trick pony with the Austin Powers stuff.. I would put Sandler ahead of him who has opened many massively profitable movies.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-10-2005, 02:42 PM
Dominic Dominic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 611
Default Re: Who\'s More Successful? SNL Edition

[ QUOTE ]
An oscar nomination is pretty serious cred for a former comic.

[/ QUOTE ]

Aykroyd and Downey Jr. also have had Oscar noms.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.