#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: results
this is factually accurate, but i don't think i would ever spell lambasted like that. although i sort of like "lamb basted" and might start using it now.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
this is factually accurate, but i don't think i would ever spell lambasted like that. although i sort of like "lamb basted" and might start using it now. [/ QUOTE ] funny cause as i read that i was thinkng, WTF? doesnt seem like him to misspell. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: results
I stopped reading that posted at "lamb basted" and then when I finished reading, I went back and stared at it some more.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
this is factually accurate, but i don't think i would ever spell lambasted like that. although i sort of like "lamb basted" and might start using it now. [/ QUOTE ] you had it as "amb basted" i believe. i took the (incorrect) liberty of adding an 'L'. you know u cant use those fancy words with me. i thought maybe it was a saying id never heard of. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: results
haha
good post. Anyway, I think the point I'm trying to make here is that betting to induce a bluff then calling is probably a poor idea, unless you think you can make very good decisions when faced with a river CR. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hu 5/10 river decisions vs fsuplayer - deepish
You must have bet the river to induce a bluff so you should now call. IF that's not the case, then I think it's a bad bet on the river. Check behind.
|
|
|