|
View Poll Results: Usefulness | |||
Waste of Time | 5 | 2.96% | |
Use it a little | 9 | 5.33% | |
Moderate Usage | 28 | 16.57% | |
Use it a lot | 59 | 34.91% | |
Couldn't do without it | 68 | 40.24% | |
Voters: 169. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
How about this !!
A three tab structure:
1) Game Type (Holdem, Omaha, etc) 2) Game Structure (Limit, NL PL) 3) Stakes/Blinds (50/1.00, 1/2, etc.) I find it awkward to have to scroll up/down to find available tables at a certain structure because they do not sort together Also, an option to filter out full tables, only displaying available tables. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How about this !!
I actually like it the way it is and think it's one of the better poker lobbies out there.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PRIMA Lobby, I am giving away $50 to a poster in this thread
I just started playing there and don't really love the lobby. Perhaps it is because I am used to Party.
I don't really need a "my favorites" I just need a quick and esy way to get to the limit games I want. I also hate that when I click the sort button even when I was looking at the limit games it seems I have to scroll up again. Finally, the one thing that imo really needs to be fixed is the fold call raise buttons are in a different order than pretty much every site. I think it makes sense in that order for a couple of reasons, most importantly that actions go from weakest to strongest left to right which makes logical sense to me. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PRIMA Lobby, I am giving away $50 to a poster in this thread
Checkboxes for game type (HE, Omaha, Stud)
Checkboxes for limit type (NL, PL, Fixed) Checkboxes for game limit (1/2, 2/4, 5/10) Radio button for min number of players. Each of the checkboxes is a delimiter for the search (study up on your SQL COALESCE statement). |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PRIMA Lobby, I am giving away $50 to a poster in this thread
the "find player" and "promotions and events" buttons should be switched with the smaller "bank" and "menu" buttons. People use the latter much more, IMO.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PRIMA Lobby, I am giving away $50 to a poster in this thread
genius
a brilliant new twist on how to get away with spam, Hav [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] (does this get me into the draw?) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PRIMA Lobby, I am giving away $50 to a poster in this thread
The way they do it has always annoyed me. I voted 2. Much easier to find the type of game that I want rather than having to scroll through all the types that I don't. Plus, everyone else does it this way, so I guess that I'm used to it.
Played half my bonus there and cashed out. Not worth the trouble. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PRIMA Lobby, I am giving away $50 to a poster in this thread
I voted for #2, although I just have to click twice on the Limit column header to bring Fixed Limit games to the top and then I can scroll down to $1/2 games.
But my problem is with the waiting lists. They often seem to fail, and if I actually go to the table I may see an empty seat that I can take. I might return to the Lobby five minutes after I've taken it and I see I'm still on the waiting list. Works sometimes but often not. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PRIMA Lobby, I am giving away $50 to a poster in this thread
Definatley option three. It's annoying if you are looking for e.g. a 2/4 limit game to have to scroll through dozens of other tables. I think Party solved this very nicely with their tree structure. Perhaps a couple checkboxes for game criterias could solve this?
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PRIMA Lobby, I am giving away $50 to a poster in this thread
having the option to filter by stakes would be good. then you could sort by highest pot or whatever and not have different stakes mixed together.
|
|
|