Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:06 PM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: QQ - the right amount of aggression?

Well I keep myself out of these tough spots and just check and call. If he shows me AA or KK, that is just the way it goes. Betting the flop is silly in this hand, but check/raising seems silly too against an unknown. If you get into a spewing war you will probably lose, but at the same time, can you fold to a flop 3-bet? If we know that he plays ABC poker then yes you can play it this way, but unknowns will play hands in various ways. Some will go into a shell with KK and others will keep raising with TT. Since I don't know what he will do and don't like making raise/fold plays against unknowns I just call down and learn something about it. Remember that giving free or cheap cards isn't as critical in this pot since we might not have the best hand to begin with. If we had AA we would obviously like to charge the 3rd player through the nose, but it isn't as critical here.

Brad
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:06 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default RESULTS

Thanks, everybody, for the interesting discussion. Shillx brought up an entirely new way for me to look at preflop action. Very interesting.

So, I pulled a switcheroo on all of you. "Hero" in the HH was actually the Villan, and I was MP3 with KK. I played the hand the only way I thought I could; the bet/3-bet on the flop after my preflop cap made me put SB on AA/KK/QQ/JJ (KK or JJ would've been VERY surprising, for different reasons), so I figured I was WA/WB and called down.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:09 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 197
Default Re: QQ - the right amount of aggression?

[ QUOTE ]
Betting the flop is silly in this hand, but check/raising seems silly too against an unknown. If you get into a spewing war you will probably lose, but at the same time, can you fold to a flop 3-bet?

[/ QUOTE ]
of course we can't fold to a flop 3-bet if we check raise, but we can check fold the turn unimproved if he 3-bets the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:15 PM
tiltaholic tiltaholic is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: QQ - the right amount of aggression?

[ QUOTE ]
Well I keep myself out of these tough spots and just check and call. If he shows me AA or KK, that is just the way it goes. Betting the flop is silly in this hand, but check/raising seems silly too against an unknown. If you get into a spewing war you will probably lose, but at the same time, can you fold to a flop 3-bet? If we know that he plays ABC poker then yes you can play it this way, but unknowns will play hands in various ways. Some will go into a shell with KK and others will keep raising with TT. Since I don't know what he will do and don't like making raise/fold plays against unknowns I just call down and learn something about it. Remember that giving free or cheap cards isn't as critical in this pot since we might not have the best hand to begin with. If we had AA we would obviously like to charge the 3rd player through the nose, but it isn't as critical here.

Brad

[/ QUOTE ]

this has a lot of appeal too. (check calling as opposed to check raising)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:18 PM
lautzutao lautzutao is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6
Default Re: QQ - the right amount of aggression?

Ok, but given the way the action went on the flop, 3-betting might have been incorrect, but isn't not capping by the villian incorrect as well? What do we do on the turn here now? Just check it through and hope he doesn't bet? Fold to a turn bet?

This is what is confusing me so much I guess. I can't grasp why this flop wouldn't be capped. Villian just wants to see a cheap showdown from this point foward?

The way the action DID go I don't think we can expect villian to 3-bet us. Where do we go from there?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:23 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QQ - the right amount of aggression?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well I keep myself out of these tough spots and just check and call. If he shows me AA or KK, that is just the way it goes. Betting the flop is silly in this hand, but check/raising seems silly too against an unknown. If you get into a spewing war you will probably lose, but at the same time, can you fold to a flop 3-bet? If we know that he plays ABC poker then yes you can play it this way, but unknowns will play hands in various ways. Some will go into a shell with KK and others will keep raising with TT. Since I don't know what he will do and don't like making raise/fold plays against unknowns I just call down and learn something about it. Remember that giving free or cheap cards isn't as critical in this pot since we might not have the best hand to begin with. If we had AA we would obviously like to charge the 3rd player through the nose, but it isn't as critical here.

Brad

[/ QUOTE ]

this has a lot of appeal too. (check calling as opposed to check raising)

[/ QUOTE ]

This is how I play it as well Against an unknown I'm not happy about folding the turn if he 3-bets our flop c/r. An unknown might be overplaying AJ or AK, or K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] or any number of hands. The pot has gotten pretty big just calling down costs 2.5BB vs 1.5BB is we c/r and get 3 bet, and now we don't have the opportunity to fold the best hand.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:25 PM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: QQ - the right amount of aggression?

I don't have time to elaborate right now, but the villian played his kings perfectly. If he gets into a war with them, he is going to look at either AA or JJ.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:29 PM
Hojglad Hojglad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: QQ - the right amount of aggression?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
haha, my 2nd orbit at a table and I'm dealt KK. I'm capping the flop and raising the turn if I'm bet into. I'll slow down to the 3-bet

*EDIT- Maybe this is Egoistic Fallacy, but with zilch known about the villian...this is how normal KK would be played here yes?

[/ QUOTE ]

EF aside, put yourself in MP3's seat. You capped preflop and then got bet into and 3-bet by an unknown OOP Villan...what do you put him on?

[/ QUOTE ]

JJ

[/ QUOTE ]
QQ
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-07-2005, 05:37 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QQ - the right amount of aggression?

I play it the same and expect to win.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-07-2005, 06:49 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default Re: QQ - the right amount of aggression?

[ QUOTE ]
I don't have time to elaborate right now, but the villian played his kings perfectly. If he gets into a war with them, he is going to look at either AA or JJ.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going to frame this and put it on my wall. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.