|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: WR in SB (From position stats in PokerTracker at ONE limit w/ 1/2 blind structure) | |||
| .14 or greater |
   
|
3 | 15.79% |
| .13 |
  
|
1 | 5.26% |
| .1 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| .11 |
  
|
3 | 15.79% |
| .12 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 0-.5 |
  
|
8 | 42.11% |
| .6 |
|
0 | 0% |
| .7 |
|
1 | 5.26% |
| .8 |
|
1 | 5.26% |
| .9 |
|
2 | 10.53% |
| Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
09-12-2005, 01:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Level 3, over the top with TT?
Please replace EP with 3 off the button (aka MP).
Basically the tightest player in the world will tend to raise AA-88 and AK-AJ, KQ maybe....now realize that almost no one is the tighest player in the world. Some people are actually much looser. Meanwhile we have under 4x the BB and TT. Folding is just flat out terrible. Folding this hand makes you just as bad as the morons who play 53s early in the tournament for a big raise. 
|
|
#23
09-12-2005, 01:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Level 3, over the top with TT?
We have 12x BB Curtainz. o0.
|
|
#24
09-12-2005, 02:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Level 3, over the top with TT?
lol. Okay but still we are short stacked. I actually knew that, I dont know why I said 4x, probably because we have 4x the raise. Also its not an EP raise! If the table was full , everyone would be calling it an MP raise.
|
|
#25
09-12-2005, 10:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Level 3, over the top with TT?
OK, I agree with you about the position thing. Still, it's six handed and a tight player raised UTG. If the guy was a typical 22 donk, then the decision woulld be easy. But the OP has a read that this is not the case. Lets go ahead and open his range a bit though, say 77+, A9+, KJ+, QJ. Tens are still only 55% to win. And that's a pretty wide range for a "tight" player, IMHO. I think this is a lot closer than people are making it out to be.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
