Former Bush Team Member Questions WTC Collapse

[superleeds]

[ QUOTE ]
***notice I'm only responding to Max Power, TSC, Lastchance, and a few others

[/ QUOTE ]

Is that cos you've got your head up your arse?

[guller]

If they already had the building rigged with explosives, why equip the plane with a military pod and missle, as seen in previous posts?

[Beavis68]

[ QUOTE ]

But you do know that 2-3 months before 911 the acting head of FBI resigned and took a low job at WTC as head of security in the month leading up to 911, he did die at that site...that and the next head of FBI resigned right around 911.



[/ QUOTE ]

Louis Freeh was a Clinton appointee, not an acting director. Pickard was the acting director and was head during the attacks.

John O'Neil was a deputy director that was working as director of public safety at the WTC and was killed.

And you guys say Christians are dumb.

[SpearsBritney]

You guys keep coming in and picking and choosing which pieces of evidence may or may not have happened. You are not however, disproving any of it. You are simply saying; ..oh yeah?!... well, this could be possible too.

Now, I'm sure you're thinking; "How is that any different from what you're doing?" Well, I'll tell you. I have spent many hours (god only knows why) pointing out all of the anomalies with the Bush Administration's "Official Story". Basically doing your homework for you. I have linked numerous web sites, pictures, videos, calculations, etc. You guys are just taking turns jumping in (half-interested) when ever you think you see an inconsistency.

The problem with your story is this; Putting aside for one second the MOUNTAIN of physical evidence, there are literally hundreds of HUGE holes in the "Official Story". The odds of even a FRACTION of these anomalies to have happened/not happened, as you are suggesting, are by no exaggeration, ASTRONOMICAL.

[SpearsBritney]

[ QUOTE ]
If they already had the building rigged with explosives, why equip the plane with a military pod and missle, as seen in previous posts?

[/ QUOTE ]

I have never made this assertion. Infact, I think it's absurd.

There are a good number of irrational and unsupportable 9/11 theories and theorists "out there" that have been used to great effect to discredit 9/11 truth advocates as whole (Check out Rule 4 in " The Twenty-five Rules of Disinformation " to grasp the tactic and then watch it in action in Popular Mechanics' recent 9/11 smear). We are therefore also concerned about these spurious plot lines and how they are exploited, and we criticize many on our site . Every large and growing movement picks up a few noisy dunces or provocateurs in the margins, but they do not in any way invalidate the well researched evidence at its core. We only pray that those drawn to the 9/11 issue by sensationalist claims will stay long enough to learn the less theatrical but equally damning truth.

[SpearsBritney]

There's a very good reason why it takes weeks, if not months, for specially trained proffessionals to carefully plan and execute controlled demolitions, and it is this:

BUILDINGS DO NOT COLLAPSE INTO THEIR OWN FOOTPRINT!!!!

[SpearsBritney]

Now watch these again. These buildings are not "structurally failing". They are literally disintigrating from the top down. A "structural failure" would cause the top of the building to topple over, not systematically blast every floor of the building to smithereens.

Look at the "debris avalanche" of the north tower. You will see the debris cloud rapidly projecting outward. That's no small distance it's traveling. Those are explosions propeling that debris, not simply energy escaping from the collapsing building.

Pay special attention to the south tower. You can EASILY see the timed explosions a few floors beneath each other.(You can also see it on the north tower, but you have to look a little bit closer.)

North Tower

South Tower

There's no disputing it. Those are explosions my friends.

[SpearsBritney]

3) Instant Fulfillment of the Neocon Wish List

For a huge military buildup and Middle East energy control
- In September 2000, one year before 9/11, the Bush team's neocon think tank PNAC (Project for a New American Century) published a plan for global domination called "Rebuilding America's Defenses". (Top Bush Administration figures like Cheney, Perle, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld et al. were signers of PNAC's Statement of Principles.)
Their plan called for a huge boost in defense spending, full spectrum dominance over all nations and regions (including outer space), long term petro-resource control with permanent Middle East bases, and a preemptive war policy against recalcitrant states. However, they openly conceded that such a huge "transformation" would take forever "absent some cataclysmic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."

It's time to open your eyes.

[Sifmole]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There are plenty of plausable explanations.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would like to hear just one.

The fact that Silverstien (WTC owner) himself admitted that WTC7 was a controlled demolition (WHICH TAKES WEEKS TO SET UP!!!) should be enough evidence on it's own.

(I would also like to add that I'm totaly pwning this thread-you guys got nothin!)

[/ QUOTE ]

You pwn nothing, because you haven't responded to simple, succinct questions. You deflected and again resort to subjective discussions -- look at known facts first, if those can't be reconciled ( reasonably ) with the conspiracy theory then you don't have a leg to stand on.

Simple question -- why resort to complicating your conspiracy by using a cruise missle and claiming it was an airplane? When you managed to utilize at least two other airplanes and apparently ( by the conspiracy itself ) have a large amount of resources at your disposal. It makes no sense what-so-ever. Make that make sense and you may be started.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

But you do know that 2-3 months before 911 the acting head of FBI resigned and took a low job at WTC as head of security in the month leading up to 911, he did die at that site...that and the next head of FBI resigned right around 911.



[/ QUOTE ]

Louis Freeh was a Clinton appointee, not an acting director. Pickard was the acting director and was head during the attacks.

John O'Neil was a deputy director that was working as director of public safety at the WTC and was killed.

And you guys say Christians are dumb.

[/ QUOTE ]

PS Neil D. Levin, the then-head of the Port Authority, died in the attack. One would imagine that the very terrorist Mr. Silverstein, or the Port Authority, or the CIA, or the government, or the illuminati, or the pizza connection, or whoever it was that planned this "conspiracy", would have filled him in. After all, it is the Port Authority's land.